Click the link for illustrations.
If even half of this is true, it is dynamite.
I looked at the site - has anyone confronted the "architect" about his real reasons for designing the memorial this way?
http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php
Flight 93 Memorial Still an Islamofascist Shrine
Earlier today, mainstream media (aka the New York Times and Associated Press) told us that the Flight 93 “Crescent of Embrace” memorial had been (grudgingly) redesigned to remove its incredibly offensive inclusion of the religious symbol of the 9/11 hijackers.
At Error Theory, Alec Rawls says it’s a trick: Redesigned Flight 93 memorial still an Islamo-fascist shrine. link: 383 comments
--
link the previous topics on items like this. Would help the new folks and those who missed them teh first time benefit from all the info digging that's gone before.
09/08/05 09:32 PM: Flight 93 Outrage
09/11/05 02:04 PM: Flight 93 Memorialized with Red Crescent
09/13/05 10:53 AM: Steyn: Flight 93, Re-Hijacked
09/16/05 08:13 AM: Crescent of Embrace
10/22/05 08:15 AM: Flight 93 "Crescent of Embrace" Remains Unchanged
Color me shocked; elitest "artist" and company revel in putting one over on us proles. And how proud he must be of his "inclusive" move, using 44 translucent blocks to count the terrorists among the victims. Thank goodness for the internet. We'll get the word out, even if the MSM won't. Information on who runs this memorial site here.
bttt
If anyone is interested in a little activism, I have created a letter that sends a message to Gale Norton and others who have the power to put a stop to this. All you have to do is use the form, and I have done the rest. You may know others who are interested in helping with this effort, so please pass it on ...
http://www.amsiriano.com/blog.php?archive=200512#1650
Thank you
A M Siriano
http://www.amsiriano.com
Ping