Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq - Democrats Lied About WMDs
USS Neverdock ^ | 11/3/05 | Marc

Posted on 11/03/2005 6:14:35 AM PST by areafiftyone

 

Iraq - Democrats Lied About WMDs

Yesterday, former President Jimmy Carter accused the Bush Administration of manipulating pre war intelligence about Iraq's WMDs. But here's what he said back in Feb 03.

"He obviously has the capability and desire to build prohibited weapons and probably has some hidden in his country.

Here is a handy list of what the Democrats were saying about Iraq and WMDs before the election campaign.

See here for more debunking of the Bush lied myth.
(Info from the Link posted below)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

 

"Bush lied" campaign collapses

The Democrat's and anti-war movement's "Bush lied" campaign has collapsed.

First, weapons of mass destruction (WMD) have been found here, here, here and here.

Second, links between Saddam and Al Qaeda proven here, here, here, here and here.

Third, it seems Saddam was trying to buy Uranium from Nigeria after all.

Inquiry will back intelligence that Iraq sought uranium

That is in addition to US reveals Iraq nuclear operation

The US has revealed that it removed more than 1.7 metric tons of radioactive material from Iraq in a secret operation last month.

Fourth, there was no pressure put on US intelligence over Iraq.

The unanimous report by the panel will say there is no evidence that intelligence officials were subjected to pressure to reach particular conclusions about Iraq.

Fifth, the Iraq war was about oil alright as we can plainly see from the UN oil-for-food scandal.

The evidence proving Bush was right is also coming from some unlikely sources.

Russia Warned U.S. About Iraq, Putin Says

Russian President Vladimir Putin said yesterday that his intelligence service had warned the Bush administration before the U.S. invasion of Iraq that Saddam Hussein's government was planning attacks against U.S. targets both inside and outside the country.

Clinton defends successor's push for war

Clinton, who was interviewed Thursday, said he did not believe that Bush went to war in Iraq over oil or for imperialist reasons but out of a genuine belief that large quantities of weapons of mass destruction remained unaccounted for.

Noting that Bush had to be "reeling" in the wake of the attacks of September 11, 2001, Clinton said Bush's first priority was to keep al Qaeda and other terrorist networks from obtaining "chemical and biological weapons or small amounts of fissile material."

"That's why I supported the Iraq thing. There was a lot of stuff unaccounted for," Clinton said in reference to Iraq and the fact that U.N. weapons inspectors left the country in 1998.


Front Page goes further.

An article titled "The Big Lie Campaign", contains this:

In either case – and in both cases – what we are confronting in this spectacle is an unprecedented event in American political life. In the midst of a good war and a noble enterprise, a major American party [the Democrats] is engaged in an effort to stab its own country in the back for short term political gain, and is willing to do to so by the most underhanded and unscrupulous means.

Terrorists the world over must be laughing at how we are tearing ourselves apart while they make plans to speed up the process.


UPDATE: More on the Uranium - Niger - Saddam story and it was Joe Wilson who lied not Bush. Happy Anniversary to Joseph C. Wilson IV

And the The Senate Intelligence Committee Report by Dan Darling.

Also, this demolishes 2 of Richard Clarke's key claims with respect to Iraq: that there was no Iraqi involvement in terrorism post-1993, and that there is no evidence whatsoever of Iraqi support for al-Qaeda. Both of these claims, to put it quite simply, can now be shown to be factually untrue.

Here is a handy list of what the Democrats were saying about Iraq and WMDs before the election campaign.

UPDATE 2: The UK Lord Butler Report backs Blair and Bush on Iraq's attempts to buy Uranium from Niger.

499. We conclude that, on the basis of the intelligence assessments at the time, covering both Niger and the Democratic Republic of Congo, the statements on Iraqi attempts to buy uranium from Africa in the Government’s dossier, and by the Prime Minister in the House of Commons, were well-founded.

By extension, we conclude also that the statement in President Bush’s State of the Union Address of 28 January 2003 that: The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa, was well-founded.


UPDATE

More Democrats who claim Iraq had WMDs

More Chemical weapons found?

Joseph Wilson lied



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: demlies; iraq; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: rightfielder
and they (the insurgents) are also using armour-piercing 7.62 rounds..and getting more sophisticated with the IED's.
Force should be met with equal or greater force..IMAO..
61 posted on 11/06/2005 10:05:53 AM PST by concretebob (We should give anarchists what they want. Then we can kill them and not worry about jailtime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: unionblue83
FINALLY!!!
Thanks for being an intelligent, well read, informed, American.
and Thank You for reinforcing my point.
Assigning Constitutional protections to terrorist acts will criminalize them, and anyone who can't see that doesn't understand the 5th Amendment..
If we give the diaper heads 3 Amendments, how long before they get the rest of them?
Frankly, I'll give 'em the First Amendment, but I reserve the right to exercise the Second if they don't behave.
62 posted on 11/06/2005 12:46:03 PM PST by concretebob (We should give anarchists what they want. Then we can kill them and not worry about jailtime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: unionblue83

An entire Russian BN helped them move the stuff. We have the imagery. I think the first "selected target" should be Damascus. Preferably with about 3 dozen Tomahawks


63 posted on 11/06/2005 2:05:36 PM PST by stm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: stm
You may want to read some Scripture before you select targets..
"I looked, and behold, Damascus was no longer a city"...I think that is from Eziekial...but I'll double-check..
The signifignce is that there has ALWAYS been a city at Damascus, since recorded history...and the destruction of Damascus is the beginning of the End Times..and the Tribulation.
There is a website where you can enter partial Scriptures and it will return the Book, Chapter and verse number.
I need to find that site again..
There is also a website where you can enter Latin phrases and get the translation..
My profile page has the shield from the 49th Fighter Wing out of Holliman AFB...Their motto is Tutor Elutor (Guardian and Avenger)...my buddy who was a 16 mechanic in the early '80's didn't even know what it meant until I told him.
But I digress...
64 posted on 11/06/2005 4:34:20 PM PST by concretebob (We should give anarchists what they want. Then we can kill them and not worry about jailtime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: concretebob; stm

OK, we'll compromise -- what a perfect opportunity to try out the neutron bomb; supposedly leaves infrastructure intact. But seriously folks, there is definitely a need for regime change in Syria. Lebanon was a proud Christian nation until the iron-fisted Assads came to town, with a little help from their friends in Tehran. Bashar is obviously going to hold to power as long as possible and will probably send up his family memebers, implicated in Mehlis' report, to the firing squad. Then, he will attempt a PR campaign to make it look like he is "rooting out the elements involved". Bolton's job at the UN is to make sure that no one buys this BS. Don't hear much out of Syria in the way of opposition to the Ba'athists but then again those who did speak up probably would be around to continue. I really think Bush touched something off over there with planting a democratic government smack dab in the middle of the Middle East. We just need to make sure it thrives, and , personally, I think it will. It just may require some "preventative maintenance now and then.


65 posted on 11/07/2005 4:18:43 AM PST by unionblue83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: unionblue83
I concur with everything you posted.
Good job
66 posted on 11/07/2005 1:53:20 PM PST by concretebob (We should give anarchists what they want. Then we can kill them and not worry about jailtime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: concretebob

Thanks. I've just recently registered but have "stood on the sidelines" of FreeRepulic, as it were, for some time. Wow, this stuff is addictive.


67 posted on 11/08/2005 4:39:44 AM PST by unionblue83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson