Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. DISCUSSES INVASION OF SAUDI ARABIA
www.menewsline.com ^ | Nov 1, 2005

Posted on 11/01/2005 1:23:57 PM PST by Esther Ruth

U.S. DISCUSSES INVASION OF SAUDI ARABIA

WASHINGTON [MENL] -- The United States has raised the prospect of a military invasion of Saudi Arabia.

The response could include the deployment of three U.S. Army divisions backed by fighter-jets and airborne early-warning and alert aircraft. In all, the U.S.-led mission could include up to 300,000 troops.

The House Armed Services Committee was briefed on the prospect of a Saudi coup and U.S. response during a hearing on Oct. 26. The scenario was outlined by Michael O'Hanlon, a senior fellow of the Brookings Institution, who cited a Saudi coup as one of several threats to the United States.

"How should the United States respond if a coup, presumably fundamentalist in nature, overthrows the royal family in Saudi Arabia?" O'Hanlon asked. "Such a result would raise the specter of major disruption to the oil economy."

NOTE: The above is not the full item.

This service contains only a small portion of the information produced daily by Middle East Newsline. For a subscription to the full service, please contact Middle East Newsline at: editor@menewsline.com for further details.

(Excerpt) Read more at menewsline.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: saudiarabia; usinvasion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2005 1:23:58 PM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Should have a contingency plan for Massachusettes, as well


2 posted on 11/01/2005 1:26:19 PM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


3 posted on 11/01/2005 1:26:43 PM PST by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Why the heck is this in the public domain, if true? I would like to know who the traitor on the House Armed Services Committee is.


4 posted on 11/01/2005 1:27:07 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


5 posted on 11/01/2005 1:27:10 PM PST by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven

LOL!


6 posted on 11/01/2005 1:27:34 PM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Is this supposed to be newsworthy?

I don't mean to be glib, but there are probably hundreds if not thousands of scenarios that have been gamed by those whose job it is to determine how to handle situations.

I am sure we have gamed an invasion of Mexico, Canada, Venezuela, Cuba, Panama; Berkeley (oops sorry) China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, darned near any country you can think of, and certainly every country in the Mideast.

Why would anyone be surprised or shocked?


7 posted on 11/01/2005 1:28:07 PM PST by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Fast reaction would be key.

There would be no support for a build-up, nor the ridiculous game of show that we've practiced for many years with the U.N.


8 posted on 11/01/2005 1:28:18 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
Military planners making contingency plans? I'm shocked!

We probably have plans on what to do if Quebec declared Independence and Canada asks us for aid.

9 posted on 11/01/2005 1:28:20 PM PST by KarlInOhio (We were promised someone in the Scalia/Thomas mold. Let's keep it going with future nominees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven

"Should have a contingency plan for Massachusettes, as well"
And use it a.s.a.p.


10 posted on 11/01/2005 1:28:36 PM PST by sopwith (don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Conquering SA should take all of 24 hours, perhaps a bit longer should we decide to TURN MECCA INTO A PARKING LOT along the way.....


11 posted on 11/01/2005 1:28:52 PM PST by michaelbfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

I think it's just a bit of forward thinking. Who knows who you will have to fight in a few years down the road? At least the intelligence isn't starting flat footed this way.

Heck, I bet we have contigency plans for an invasion of Canada (I would humbly suggest invading the "French part" first)


12 posted on 11/01/2005 1:29:06 PM PST by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
Is this post calculated to generate hissy fits from the permanently clueless?

I can't think of another reason otherwise to post this.

13 posted on 11/01/2005 1:29:44 PM PST by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
If - in a measured and deliberate way - we start a major program building coal-to-oil conversion infrastructure - then after a few years we would become self-sufficient in oil at $30s a barrel level. After that whatever happens in places like Saudi Arabia would be a matter of extreme irrelevance. And we might have the necessary time window because SA is not going to collapse in a coup tomorrow. Of course, contingency planning never hurts.
14 posted on 11/01/2005 1:29:58 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

only one way: shock and awe


15 posted on 11/01/2005 1:30:00 PM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

300,000? Not NEARLY enough for Saudi Arabia...


16 posted on 11/01/2005 1:30:05 PM PST by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

That's great...I hope we didn't sell them the latest block-OFPs for their F-16 CC's......


17 posted on 11/01/2005 1:30:19 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Sorry, Esther Ruth, I hope I didn't sound like I was being disrespectful there.

From the "About us..." at the website:

"Welcome to Middle East Newsline, a defense news service by independent journalists with a real understanding of the region. Our correspondents gather information from Ankara, Athens, Amman, Cairo, Jerusalem, London, Moscow, Nicosia, Ramallah and Washington."


18 posted on 11/01/2005 1:30:45 PM PST by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evets

WTFO?


19 posted on 11/01/2005 1:31:29 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
If it is allowed to discuss the concept of contingency plans, as well as details, they become rather worthless.
Further, discussing them with anyone who has no clue why contingency plans are necessary is a waste of time.

So why this post?

20 posted on 11/01/2005 1:32:18 PM PST by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson