Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CONDI UPS ANTE ON CRESCENT-KISSING – SAYS ISLAM’S A RELIGION OF PEACE AND LOVE
grasstopsusa.com ^ | October 31, 2005 | Don Feder

Posted on 10/31/2005 6:33:28 PM PST by B4Ranch

CONDI UPS ANTE ON CRESCENT-KISSING – SAYS ISLAM’S A RELIGION OF PEACE AND LOVE
GrassTopsUSA Exclusive Commentary
By Don Feder


While I never imagined Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to be a conservative, I used to think she was vaguely connected to reality.  Her October 25th speech at an Iftaar dinner (marking the end of Ramadan) disabused me of that notion.  It was an exercise in crescent-kissing to put even her boss to shame.

Upping the ante on Western Muslim mania, madam secretary promoted Islam from religion of peace to “religion of love and peace.” (You always hurt the ones you love?) Islam’s love letters usually come with TNT attached.

“We in America know the benevolence that is at the heart of Islam,” Rice remarked. “We’ve seen it in many ways.”

Muslim benevolence may be glimpsed in a ceremony just days ago in Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates, where Sheikh Abdul Rahman Al Sudais (imam of Mecca’s Grand Mosque) received the Islamic Personality of the Year Award.

In a 2003 sermon, Sheikh Love prayed that Allah would “terminate” the Jews, who he benevolently called “the scum of humanity, the rats of the world, prophet killers … pigs and monkeys” (the latter comes from the Koran). On other occasions Al-Sudais referred to Jews as “evil,” a “continuum of deceit,” “tyrannical” and “treacherous” – doubtless, all terms of endearment among devotees of the religion of peace and love.

Rice went on to observe: “We in America also know that Muslims … possess certain basic rights that arise from our equal human dignity.  Among these are the right to live without oppression, the right to worship without persecution, and the right to think and speak and assemble without wrongful retribution.”

Pity Muslims don’t extend the same rights to religious minorities in their counties -- Christians in Nigeria, Jews in Iran, Orthodox in Kosovo, Egyptian Copts, etc.

Earlier this month, there were riots outside a Coptic church in Alexandria, Egypt.  It took 5,000 police to quell the crowd protesting a play at the church which it believed had defamed its adorable religion.  Days before, a Muslim stabbed a nun to retaliate for the sale of a DVD of the play.  Crossing “peace and love” can be a risky business.

Besides puckering up for the Prophet, our Secretary of State indulged in some unabashed America-bashing.  After ritual garment-rending over the sin of segregation, Condi pontificated, “So, of all nations, America has no cause for false pride and we have every reason for humility.” (Perhaps it was her years in academia that taught Rice to babble fluently.)

No reason for “false pride,” huh?  It must have been the Saudis who launched us into the computer age. Guess it was the Egyptians who spent half-a-century feeding the world’s hungry.  Were those Iranians hitting the beach on D-Day? – probably not, given that most adherents of the religion of peace and love were rooting for the Nazis.

Her fondness for Islam must be behind Rice’s advocacy of a Palestinian state. Why limit the love to only 1,000-plus dead Israelis in the past five years?

In all of existence, there is no greater dichotomy than between the way Islam is portrayed by its Western admirers and the way it’s practiced by its more enthusiastic adherents. Wherever large numbers of Muslims come in contact with “infidels,” all jihad breaks loose.  That’s as true on the West Bank as it is in the Kashmir, as much a reality in the Philippines as the Balkans and as sure in West Africa as it is in Indonesia.

There are two possible explanations for this phenomenon:

1) Islam is indeed a religion of sweetness and light which, for some inexplicable reason, tends to provoke the wrath of non-Muslims of every variety.

2) Islam is an atavistic cult (more ideology than religion) whose tenets glorify holy war, teach contempt for other peoples, foster toxic resentment and inspire megalomania among its followers.

Yet, reality notwithstanding, Western elites insist on seeing Islam through Condi-colored glasses.  No amount of suicide bombing, anti-Semitic agitation (Jordanian TV is airing a series on the Jewish conspiracy for global domination – The Protocols of The Elders of Zion for Dummies), rampant misogyny, persecution of Christians or slaughter of innocents is allowed to penetrate this mindset.

Love (as well as body parts) was in the air in India on Saturday, when bomb blasts in two crowded New Delhi markets killed 61, among them a number children. While no one has claimed responsibility, police are saying it has all the earmarks of the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, the jihadi group attempting to wrest the Kashmir away from India.

Isn’t it odd how the religion of love and peace often inspires such murderous rage among its disciples?  I don’t recall Moses, Jesus or Buddha saying, ‘If you kill infidels, you’ll go straight to heaven and get 70 doe-eyed virgins in the bargain.”  While most religions went through a violent stage, Islam’s has lasted for almost 1,400 years – and counting.

The standard Western response is that terrorism in the name of Islam is the work of fanatics, extremists – a fringe element that somehow has managed to misinterpret its peaceable and adorable faith and turn it into an incendiary device.

This overlooks opinion surveys in the Islamic world which show substantial support for the Muslim version of Murder Inc.  It also ignores the fact that, despite constant urging and every opportunity to do so, so-called Muslim moderates somehow never get around to repudiating jihad violence. It also assumes that George Bush and Condi Rice know more about Islam than the sheikhs of Mecca, the mullahs of Iran, the imams of the West Bank or the religious scholars of Cairo’s al-Azhar University. Did our Secretary of State read the Cliff Notes Koran?

One who shares Condi’s pro-Prophet euphoria is the House of Windsor’s Dumbo.  Prince Charles is heading here to lecture us on the need for greater acceptance of the swellest religion ever.  Re: Islam, “I find the language and rhetoric coming from America too confrontational,” the Prince of Wales maintains. Did Neville Chamberlain take too confrontational an approach to the Third Reich?

One of Charles’s more distinguished countrymen had this to say of Islam: “Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities… But the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.  No stronger retrograde force exists anywhere in the world.” Unlike Prince Charles, Winston Churchill didn’t inherit his position, but did experience Islam in the raw.

I hope Rice’s Iftaar remarks receive the widest possible circulation.  It should help disillusion those conservatives who are pushing her as the GOP presidential candidate in ’08.  Who would she run with, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who called for Israel to be “wiped off the map”?

Love is all around.

Don Feder is a free-lance writer, media consultant and author of "Who is afraid of the Religious Right?" and "A Jewish Conservative Looks at Pagan America."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: allah; condhimmi; condhimmirice; condi; delusion; dhimmi; dhimmitude; headinthesand; islam; moongod; muslim; pc; religionofbeheadings; rop; satan; whitewash; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

Right you are, F15Eagle!


63 posted on 11/01/2005 12:32:16 PM PST by Convert from ECUSA (Not a nickel, not a dime, no more money for Hamastine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Good article. Dick Morris aside, who is trying to sell books and stay relevant, anyone who thinks Condi Rice is qualified to be president is living in a dream world. It's not going to happen.


64 posted on 11/01/2005 12:43:20 PM PST by ValenB4 ("Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it gets." - Isaac Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

It's in the Blogger section to hide it from thinking people.


65 posted on 11/01/2005 1:01:44 PM PST by Palladin (America! America! God shed His grace on Thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; SJackson

I'm very much with the "blogger garbage" (as someone phrased it) on this one. I'm on the side of Israel. All others are with the terrorists.


blog n. Web log. Web discussion board hosting personal thoughts and opinions of others. Personal diary of the web log owner or tenant.

news n. Called "hard news" by journalists, objective statements of facts on current events

opinion n. In journalism, informal essay with thesis containing writer's opinion. At best, with argument points logically substantiated after introduction containing thesis. Written with proper English.

And From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48:

Hysteria \Hys*te"ri*a\, n. [NL.: cf. F. hyst['e]rie. See Hysteric.] (Med.)

A nervous affection, occurring almost exclusively in women, in which the emotional and reflex excitability is exaggerated, and the will power correspondingly diminished, so that the patient loses control over the emotions, becomes the victim of imaginary sensations, and often falls into paroxism or fits. [1913 Webster]

Note: The chief symptoms are convulsive, tossing movements of the limbs and head, uncontrollable crying and laughing, and a choking sensation as if a ball were lodged in the throat. The affection presents the most varied symptoms, often simulating those of the gravest diseases, but generally curable by mental treatment alone. Hysteric

[Manifests itself most densely in both women and men in humid, northern coastal, once Loyalist (to Britain, see American Revolution) areas--now Democrat states--where the affected live like rats (see Frank Sinatra) in and around large, dark cities (see _The Bostonians_, by Henry James. --Ed.]


66 posted on 11/02/2005 2:36:03 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I'd let it go in one ear and out the other, the State Dept not Feder. Hopefully their anti-Israel posturing is irrelevant, and if it's not the blame is GWB's, not Condi's.


67 posted on 11/02/2005 3:42:57 PM PST by SJackson (God isn`t dead. We just can`t talk to Him in the classroom anymore, R Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
>TROPAL

Yeah, I tracked it down
right after I got your bump.
Here's an FR thread . . .

68 posted on 11/05/2005 10:05:39 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Ya, I seen another thread on this earlier but did not read comments, just the article, and did not put the two together... Some investigator I am aye??


69 posted on 11/05/2005 10:08:01 AM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

BTTT


70 posted on 11/06/2005 5:38:20 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vehe'emin BeHaShem, vayachsheveha lo tzedaqah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I am waiting for the pro-Condi FReepers who believe that she's the 2nd coming.

Rice is a nincompoop, and I'm beginning to think Bush isn't much better. And it hurts to say that not only because of the Left's never-ending "chimp" remarks but because he came into the election with the most pro-Israel record of any US President and then promptly threw it in the trash can. Not that his courting of islam from the moment the planes hit was much of a confidence-builder.

71 posted on 11/06/2005 5:47:30 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vehe'emin BeHaShem, vayachsheveha lo tzedaqah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson