(silent rebuttal)
Posted on 10/25/2005 7:15:03 AM PDT by thebiggestdog
I have always found it fascinating that reporters for TV and newspapers always rely on so called inside sources for information on the President. An article on nydailynews.com has quote from a couple of people close to the President who say that he is "frustrated, sometimes angry and even bitter" so say his "associates." I don't know how W. could be happy, we are in the middle of a war and American soldiers are dying. Bush has steadfastly held his ground that it was the correct thing to do, but very few in his own party will cover his back.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotchicken.com ...
According to New York Times "sources", their press staff is busily engaged in an orgy of bestiality.
Gotta love those anonymous sources...
Watch Bush on TV and make up ones own mind.
ROFLMAO!!!!
Nothing could be more irrelevant than YOUR "evaluation" of Bush, on tv or otherwise. We know YOU. Ad nauseum. End of story. On a different note: I don't care whether he is angry and bummed out and frustrated, or whether he is none of the above. His feelings and attitudes say nothing whatsoever about the facts of anything or about his enemies' actions. Those are key, not "how Bush feels".
Ones writing also paints a picture of the writer.
Anyone who's been on this website longer than 15 minutes knows you despise George W. Bush.
So, your perspective is tainted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.