Posted on 10/15/2005 3:44:16 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
A paleontologist testified in the Dover school board trial about how fossils connect species.
The ancestor of the whale and its first cousin the hippopotamus walked the Earth for 40 million years, munching on plants, before dying out in the ice ages.
Known as the anthracotheres, it became extinct 50 to 60 million years ago, but not before its evolutionary tree diverged the whale forging into the oceans, the hippopotamus to the African swamps.
Kevin Padian, a University of California-Berkeley paleontologist, told the story of the whales journey, along with the travels of its closest living relative, in U.S. Middle District Court Friday to illustrate how the fossil record connects us to our past.
In the First Amendment lawsuit over Dover Area High Schools intelligent design policy, Padian was the plaintiffs final science expert to testify. The defense will begin to present its side Monday.
Padians testimony was essentially a response to intelligent-design proponents claims that paleontology does not account for missing links and the fossil record belies evolutionary theory.
The problem is that there are no clear transitional fossils linking land mammals to whales, the pro-intelligent-design textbook Of Pandas and People states.
How many intermediates do you need to suggest relationships? Padian wondered.
He pointed to numerous transitional fossils as he traced the lineage of the whale to its early ancestors, a group of cloven-hoofed mammals of a group named cetartiodactyla, illustrating the gradual changes of features along the way.
We think the transitions are pretty good, he said.
One of Padians concerns with intelligent design the idea that lifes complexities demand an intelligent designer is that it shuts down the search for answers, he said. It worries me that students would be told that you cant get from A to B with natural causes, he said.
One of the complaints of 11 parents suing the school district is that, after Dover biology students are told about intelligent design, they are referred to Pandas, which is housed in the high school library.
While the connection between the whale and hippopotamus is recent, Padian said some of the fossils linking whales to land-dwelling mammals go back to the Civil War but were ignored by the authors of Pandas.
The curator of Berkeleys Museum of Paleontology and author of the Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs also testified to the evolutionary link between dinosaurs and birds.
Pandas states, Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agent, with their distinctive features already intact fish with fins and scales, birds with feathers, beaks, and wings, etc.
But Padian, at times affectionately, showed numerous pictures and diagrams of different reptiles evolving from ones possessing scales to ones possessing feathers.
Of a fossil of an archaeopteryx found in the 1860s, Padian said, Now this is a beautiful critter.
He also criticized the books assertions on homology the study of similar characteristics of living organisms used to explain their relationships to other organisms.
As he cross-examined Padian, Dovers attorney Robert Muise brought up one of sciences most ardent evolutionists in raising questions about the fossil record.
Muise asked Padian about the late Stephen Jay Goulds theory of punctuated equilibrium, the idea that rather than Darwins characterization of evolution as slow and gradual change, it may be better described as taking place in fits and starts.
Gould offered the idea as an explanation for the patterns found in the fossil record, which shows abrupt appearances of new species, followed by long stagnant periods with little change.
While Pandas argues that intelligent-design proponents consider punctuated equilibrium unprovable, Padian said Gould offered the theory as an explanation to gaps in the fossil record.
Is natural selection responsible for punctuated equilibrium? Muise asked at one point.
Thats a great question, Padian said. While it may raise questions about the mechanism of evolution, he answered, it doesnt contradict the idea of common descent.
It seems to me that...and without any direct indictment of intent...there are valid semantical complaints on both sides of this issue.
What do you mean by that? What are the semantical complaints on both sides of the issue? :)
No I am not. You equated evolution and gravity. I'm pointing out that they are nowhere near the same. We have evidence of universal gravity. We have no such evidence for "evolution" in terms of biology.
Does anybody else remember this?? What would ice cores have to do with biological evolution?
Good question... LOL Maybe instead of ice cores, it is a reference to annual rings on a tree? ROFL Is that evidence for evolution of trees? /sarc
Ice cores are just another way of getting information about past climates. Like evrything else they have gone through a long process of debugging.
No I am not. You equated evolution and gravity. I'm pointing out that they are nowhere near the same. We have evidence of universal gravity. We have no such evidence for "evolution" in terms of biology.
This is hilarious. ET phone home? LOL (Sorry)
Evolution is a process. Gravity is a force.
What is Microsoft's newest operating system called? Longhorn? Vista? Ice cores? I think it has gone through a lot of debugging already, but hackers are finding a lot of bugs. LOL
Microsoft's operating systems have evolved into even worse systems than ever. I liked the original DOS operating system the best. /sarc
These two concepts are a little more similar than one might think - we certainly haven't verified the constancy of the gravitational constant for every star, planet, comet, etc. in the universe; in fact, in many cases, we assume it to be true to determine the mass, trajectory, etc. of unknown objects. And it works. Someone opposed to the "theory of gravity" could (wrongly) argue that this is "circular reasoning" or that "gravity hasn't been universally measured" or that "there are gaps in the theory of gravity".
Isn't that the test. Now where is ET?
Can't consider anything that might upset one's pre-conceived notions.
I think I got that much - I'm just (once again) wondering why someone is equating a totally unrelated geological concept to evolution. I guess the geology community is getting paid under the table to produce an old age of the earth so the Dirty Darwinians can have the time scale they need to establish their pet theory...
(Head shaking)
I'm not sure I understand what ET has to do with either the theory of gravity or the theory of evolution. (And I don't think I'm alone here...)
Uhh, this comment.
like evolution and gravity. Even before we had words for them, they were a natural feature of the universe.
Show me the evidence for the "natural feature of the universe" quality of "evolution".(BTW you brought up ET, I just replied in kind)
What would ice cores have to do with timelines. Age evidence, maybe.. oh doooooo tell.
What about Einstein's theory of relativity in relation to gravity?
There is clear evidence of evolution. Consider the human body. We no longer need our appendix or our little toes because we don't need to hang from trees anymore. LOL. Through evolution, these appendices are disappearing. And what is the thing about opposable thumbs that makes humans superior to other animals?
Whoops, noticed that it wasn't you that brought up ET. I didn't buy the program for this contest and I got the cast of characters wrong. Phantomworker made the ET reference.
A distinction without a difference. The masses didn't make up religion to medicate themselves. It was crammed down their throats upon pain of death.
If the self medication prevented the rabble from revolting, so much the better for the ruling classes. Religion has long been both the anesthetic and the tyrant, as so many have recognized, ala Voltaire.
Yes, it was me that brought up ET. Tomorrow I have to go out to NM near Roswell and Area 51 on business for a week. If I run into ET, I'll ask him the question about evolution and how it relates to gravity and let you know. :)
You didn't link to your source.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.