Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/11/2005 8:21:22 AM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Crackingham

Love the story title!!


2 posted on 10/11/2005 8:25:25 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Fantastic little writeup.


4 posted on 10/11/2005 8:27:43 AM PDT by NJ_gent (Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Beside my feeling that this author doesn't get the real point of the original article (win == be accepted by many vs. win == scientifically correct)...

Imagine a contract that said "Party A reserves the right to void the contract at any time." What would be the point of the contract for Party B?

Max Borders must not really read many contract because many contracts do say just that. I also believe that the default in any contract that does not specifiy a duration is often that either party can terminate the contract at will with notice. So what's the point of a contract like that and why would Party B accept it? The point is that it allows the two parties to work together and it's often the price of doing business with Party A -- and Party B has a need to do business with Party A. And I think there is a great ID vs. Evolution analogy in there...

6 posted on 10/11/2005 8:47:08 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Excelsior!


7 posted on 10/11/2005 9:06:41 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Paging Nehemiah Scudder:the Crazy Years are peaking. America is ready for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Ping

Douglas Kern must admit the sheer number of troglodytic bible-thumpers in the Creationist ranks

8 posted on 10/11/2005 9:07:31 AM PDT by JasonSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
I live very close to Dover (PA) where the school district is battling a court case over the right to read a statement (as I understand it) concerning ID in biology classes. Several teachers in the school district are resisting the school board's order to read the ID Statement.

I've had the opportunity to speak with a couple of teachers at the school district and they are acting as if they are being asked to slit their own wrists in front of their class. I suggested to them that as employees of the school district they are contractually bound to teach the course as directed by the board. If they don't like it, they could always get another job.

Heresy!

To drive home the point I suggested that should work to defeat the school board. After all they are local & elected, and so can be removed at the next election. I warned them that having a judge decide is far less desireable since it probably is irreversible except through appeal (unlikely). What if the decision doesn't go 'your way'?

Silence...

11 posted on 10/11/2005 10:19:55 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson