Stingray blogsite: Conservative Christian Commentary
To: DallasMike
Well, isn't that special?
2 posted on
10/08/2005 12:42:02 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
To: DallasMike
Bottom line: If Republicans could support Ginsburg then they should be able to support Miers. Bush betrayed us, but there is no legitimate reason to not confirm her. Still, it makes me very angry at Bush.
3 posted on
10/08/2005 12:42:33 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
("Let the wicked man forsake his way and the evil man his thoughts. Let him turn to the Lord" Is 55:7)
To: DallasMike
Miers is the Democrats' nominee!
5 posted on
10/08/2005 12:43:48 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
To: DallasMike
I wrote a
vanity on this topic last night.
Do you agree with my suspicion that this nomination is a gambit by Bush? Do you think the Dems are taking the bait?
6 posted on
10/08/2005 12:44:38 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: DallasMike
No, this highlights how much the Democrats want Miers on the court rather than known originalist. The Democrats can't do any better than Miers.
To: DallasMike
One of the parties will be in shock if Miers get confirmed. Republican, if she turns out to be Souter v.2, the Democrat, if she turns out to be the voice of fundamentalist-evangelical-christian.
15 posted on
10/08/2005 2:49:52 PM PDT by
paudio
(Four More Years..... Let's Use Them Wisely...)
To: DallasMike
Some Senate Democrats are jumping in the middle of a Republican fray to defend Harriet Miers from conservative criticism that she isn't qualified to serve on the Supreme Court. The Doctrine of the "to me come from me" political party strikes again.
19 posted on
10/08/2005 3:16:43 PM PDT by
EGPWS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson