Translation: It doesn't matter if the typeface alone proves that the document must be a forgery. After all, it's the seriousness of the charge that matters! The document may be a forgery, but the contents are still valid!
Yeah, right.
Pathetic isn't it?
"There was no analysis of what the documents actually said,"
Apparently, we are supposed to care what these documents say - even if it is proved they were made on a Personal Computer with a font that didnt exist prior to the 1980s.
Poor Mapes got caught believing in her own lies.
Not ONCE does she mention *who* they got the memos from.
Maybe she should prove that they are 'real' by telling us who they came from? Oh, she cant? we had to find out from elsewhere that a Bush-hating flake was the source? And he supposedly got them from a total stranger?!?
Let that be the story.