Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jess35

These women should never have put their child in that school to begin with. The school is not required to abandon its standards to accommodate these perverts. The school's rule helps assure that the parents of its students are in sync with the mission, and that the children in the school won't be undermining it with encouragement from their parents.

The mother and her live-in are entirely to blame for this mess. They are the only ones "using" the children, by making them props in their little pseudo-family.


330 posted on 09/27/2005 12:11:11 PM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: lady lawyer

This just occurred to me. Apparently the younger sister went to the same school for three years with no fuss. Now, this girl gets expelled after the speaking to the crowd incident.

My supposition:

Perhaps the school knew of the girl's mother and her live in homosexual partner, but decided to allow the girl, and then the other girl, to attend because it was not public. Then, the older girl made it public, and they acted.

That puts the school in even a better light. It would be educational to know all the facts.


332 posted on 09/27/2005 12:36:46 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer
These women should never have put their child in that school to begin with

You're absolutely right. That school has every right to only offer a Christian education to the children of the right kind of parents.

334 posted on 09/27/2005 12:53:39 PM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson