DEBUNKING CINDY SHEEHAN (HEAR ABE LINCOLN/JOHNNY CASH + PBS' NEIL CONAN)

NPR, FoxNews ^ | 8.31.05 | Mia T

[Mia T]

thanx for your help. ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

thanx for your help

[Cincinatus' Wife]

Information, Activism, and Resistance to U.S. Militarism, War, and Corporate Greed, Linking with Struggles Against Racism and Oppression within the United States

iacenter.org Troops out now sign up sheet

_____________________

***.... Now, the leftist anti-war groupies have found a live one, and are jumping on the bandwagon from near and far.

The groupies have created quite a sizeable coalition at Sheehan’s campout in Texas. Some of the headliners include Gold Star Families for Peace, Code Pink, Veterans for Peace, Military Families Speak Out and the Crawford Peace House.

All of these groups are on the steering committee of United for Peace and Justice, a major anti-war organization.

Also with a presence on UPJ’s steering committee is the Communist Party USA. Makes for interesting bedfellows, doesn’t it?

UPJ was the brainchild behind the march on the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York.

When 253 of its protesters were polled by the New York Sun as to whether they felt that “Iraqi attacks on Americans occupying Iraq are legitimate resistance” 67 percent answered yes.

This means Sheehan’s coalition thinks the kind of attack that killed her son is perfectly okay. ....*** Source

[Mia T]

How does Soros fit into this? Do you recall that amazing website that links up disparate groups and people? I think Zacs Mom knows the site. It would be interesting to do an analysis of the sheehan links.

[davidosborne]

Pass it on.. Spread the word.. Link to this thread...

Cindy Sheehan Counter-Rally - Tallahassee, FL: Tue, Sep. 6th

.... on any of your Counter-Sheehan threads...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1473939/posts

[Cautor]

Mia T, as always, your art and presentation are brilliant and drive home exactly the right points. Your description of Sheehan and the chic left are absolutely right on. Please keep up your excellent work reminding us what a damn mess the Clinton's left us with, and that the elitist left in the MSM and elsewhere in our country is the most dangerous enemy of all--the enemy within. BTTT

[Mia T]

thanx.

It is so irresponsible, seditious, really, for the MSM to give this unstable, anti-American person a giant megaphone during wartime. That is why the NPR incident is so interesting.

NPR's Neil Conan had the courage and the intellectual honesty to pierce the mourning veil. His penetrating questions took her off message and confirmed what we suspected all along: Cindy Sheehan ain't too bright.

I was struck by her overweening, suffocating arrogance. This foul-mouthed creature, who is putting the soldiers--and this country--AT INCREASED RISK, actually thinks she can call the shots. Delusions of grandeur in real time. It isn't pretty. She has even reserved her place in the history books. A first, I do believe.

After the Washington Post poll yesterday, and her own blown cover, I suspect her 15 minutes of fame is just about over. Soon not even Sharpton will find her a suitable photo-op prop and not even Rather (if he had a job) would touch her scatological, anti-Bush screeds. (By the way, has anyone else noticed that Cindy Sheehan has a very limited, very rigidly structured repertoire of non sequiturs?) A one-note Cindy, if you will.

The question Conan only obliquely alluded to:

How does an anti-American left-wing crazy--or worse, a standard-issue lying leftist manipulator with megalomaniacal tendencies--or perhaps even both--spawn a hero who twice volunteered to fight for his country? How does one reconcile the Cindy-Casey dissonance?

Surely Cindy Sheehan must have asked herself the very same questions. And her recent behavior reveals what her answer must have been, namely, that her paranoic, anti-American, anti-Semitic, anti-national-security radical left-wing ideology and behavior likely pushed her son in precisely the opposite direction; her lethally dangerous, vile and seditious non sequiturs likely provoked Casey Sheehan to re-enlist after the start of the war.

And hence the guilt, which she is dumping by the fetid truckload onto the president, and onto the country. She is one dispicable creature.

DEBUNKING CINDY SHEEHAN
HEAR ABE LINCOLN/JOHNNY CASH + PBS' NEIL CONAN

[Zacs Mom]

That would be Discover The Network - a very useful tool indeed.The lefties hate it!

Background info on Soros is located here: Soros Profile

and the interactive "Visual Map" of Soros' network can be seen here Soros connections

[Mia T]

thanks!

[Cautor]

"The question Conan only obliquely alluded to:

How does an anti-American left-wing crazy--or worse, a standard-issue lying leftist manipulator with megalomaniacal tendencies--or perhaps even both--spawn a hero who twice volunteered to fight for his country? How does one reconcile the Cindy-Casey dissonance?

Surely Cindy Sheehan must have asked herself the very same questions. And her recent behavior reveals what her answer must have been, namely, that her paranoic, anti-American, anti-Semitic, anti-national-security radical left-wing ideology and behavior likely pushed her son in precisely the opposite direction; her lethally dangerous, vile and seditious non sequiturs likely provoked Casey Sheehan to re-enlist after the start of the war.

And hence the guilt, which she is dumping by the fetid truckload onto the president, and onto the country. She is one dispicable creature."

Mia T--beautifully stated. I completely agree Sheehan's time preening before the media is just about up. She and her anti-American associates are too extreme even for many on the left. Her affection for anti-Semitism and wildly outlandish statements about Bush et al. are making her a pariah. But she did have enough time to do significant damage to America and those who are fighting not only for freedom, but indeed for our very survival. IMO, if we think New Orleans is bad, imagine what a nuke in NYC would be like and that's where we're headed if we don't stop the terrorists now. Thanks again for your find work.

[Sister_T]

And when did you become a moderator of this site that you can tell people what to do when they post?

MiaT, excellent work!

[paulat]

You're right. I was wrong. I still hold my opinions, but I should not tell folks how to post.

Mea culpa.

I will ask the Admin Mod to delete my comment.

[Mia T]

bump. (And make that an OFF-KEY one-note Cindy.) ;)

Defeating the terrorists is the bottom line for any rational being... which apparently excludes the radical Left, i.e., just about all of the American Left these days.

Its bottom line is regaining power. (Even if this weren't the case, the Left still lacks the requisite instincts and stomach to prosecute the War on Terror.) And the voter knows this.

As for hillary's HAWK posture, Dick Morris revealed recently that she was always THE extreme DOVE in the clinton administration.

Missus clinton, preprogrammed grind, is now simply following Al From's instructions:

the MAD hillary series
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR AMERICA,
FOR THE WORLD

MAD hillary series #1 ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE	MAD hillary series #2 HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET Do you really want THAT finger on the button?
MAD hillary series #3 "What, me worry?" THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE	MAD hillary series #4 NANO-PRESIDENT the danger of the unrelenting smallness of bill + hillary clinton
MAD hillary series #5 SCHEMA PINOCCHIO how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor

The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent₂

by Mia T, 4.6.03

 

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

 

Mia T, June 9, 1999
THE ALIENS

 

l From is sounding the alarm.
"Unless we convince Americans that Democrats are strong on national security," he warns his party, "Democrats will continue to lose elections."

Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem.

From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason.

That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will… which means both in real time and historically.

When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.)

Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent.

With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively… and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity.

With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)… and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity.

ASIDE: Wartime Bush-bashing sedition of the pre-Howard Dean, pre-Cindy Sheehan variety, with its sotto-voce old-school indirection, refinement and politesse, would sound almost quaint these days.

The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11.

[Mia T]

That was big of you. Thanx.

(BTW, I don't necessarily disagree with your critique. I wish i could get more control over the output. The 'style' of the 3-D model is really not my aesthetic choice. It is limited by the software--or at least my ignorance of it.)

[Mia T]

thanx on both counts. ;)

[Ulysse]

Leftists MSM,showbusiness,politicians...are european illness
as in USA.We have to finish the job against the blind,hysteric and criminal leftist ideology
Friendly,Ulysse