Fourteen Points for the Defense of the United States against Islamic Jihad

The New Conservative Voice ^ | 8/13/2005 | Tov B. Brog

[ConservativeVoice]

I watch, with increasing frustration, the politically correct flailing of our government and public officials in the face of the Islamic threat.

I believe in civil liberties, but not in civil suicide.

Isalam does not deserve the protections offered enlightened religions under our constitution. First, Islam is a philosophy, not a race. So, attacks on profiling are meaningless. Second, its tenets with regard to non-believers are more akin to the vengeful and intolerant "theology" of Nazism than to the enlightened acceptance preached by Jews, Christians, Bhuddists, Hindus, Zoroastrians and others.

A good place to learn more about our enemies is at Jihad Watch. To witness how readily the West seems to subjugate its values to Islam, see their sister site at Dhimmi Watch. A reguar reading of these sites is a frightening look into the moral abyss that is Islam.

Any study of Islam reveals an ideology steeped in the philosophy of violent Jihad. Jihad does not mean some internal struggle of the soul towards enlightenment. Rather, it is clearly defined as the unshakable obligation of each and every Muslim to make war, physical war, against the non-believer, offering him three choices: acceptance of Islam; subjugation, and the payment of a poll tax, "jizya", as a second-class member of society; or death.

Is that clear enough? You can join them, be a virtual slave or DIE!

Although we often hear of moderate Muslims, what does this mean? It means we are speaking of muslims who know little of their fath. Jihad is as much a part of Islam as the Holy Trinity is a part of Catholicism.

In this country, as in other western nations, we are surrounded by enemies of the Republic: Wahabist chaplains in the military; the Council on Islamic-America relations (CAIR); Islamic terror front groups; ACLU apologists; who sabotage our attempts to protect oursleves and our children; Al-Qaeda cells; the loony left of the Democratic Party; treasonous members of Congress, including John Kerry, who undermine our war efforts. All of these enemies of America are the willing dupes of the purveyors of Jihad. My patience has run out. I'm ready for extreme measures to defend our lives and property.

With the spectre of bomb blasts in London, and every likelihood that Muslims in this country are planning the same, or worse, in our streets, the time has come to accept that Islam is the problem.

Islam today is evil. There has been no reformation, no emergence of a strong movement for positive change to align Islam with the values of the West. To do so would destroy the essence of the faith. What good Muslim could accept that?

Those who call themselves Muslims are, if not guily, deserving of our suspicion.

My first preference would be the conquest and forced conversion to Christianity of the Muslim world. You might ask why I, as a Jew, suggest converting them to Christianity? Because I believe there are enough good Christians in this world to hold the bastards down while they learn to behave.

In the meantime, we need to defend our own shores against the Islamic hordes, many of whom are already here.

Therefore I make the following declaration:

Whereas:

• The United States is engaged in a war against Islamic terrorists conducting a Jihad against the whole of western civilization.
• These Islamic terrorists cannot function without Islamic state sponsorship in the form of funds, sanctuary and moral support.
• Jihad is an integral part of Islamic theology as evidenced by the text of the Koran, numerous Hadiths, interpretations and extensions of the Koran, as well as the repeated pronouncements of modern-day Islamic jurists and religious authorities.
• While Islam calls out for “peace” and “equality, these refer only to the peace of Islamic worldwide hegemony and equality among Muslims.
• No Islamic authority, in any western nation, has unconditionally condemned Islamic terrorism. All such pronouncements decry attacks against “innocents” but, according to Islamic law, no non-believer who has refused to accept Islam is innocent.
• Since any act in the furtherance of Islamic hegemony is allowed, no statements by Muslims should be unconditionally believed.
• We are now engaged in a war to the death against an Islamic culture under the domination of Jihadists and our war against Islamic terror is no less than a war against the fundamental s of Islam itself.

We Resolve:

That, in order to protect our nation, and our civilization, from the depredations of Islam, we should act according to the following principles:

1. A declaration that Islam is a political ideology and is not subject to the religious protections afforded under the Constitution of the United States.
2. Suspension of the security clearances of all Muslim employees of the federal government.
3. The ending of Muslim chaplain services in the US military, and throughout the federal government, including the prison system.
4. A declaration that any use of weapons of mass destruction against the United States by Islamic terrorists will be met by an immediate nuclear strike against Mecca and Medina.
5. In the event of a major Islamic terrorist attack within the United States, the internment of Muslim citizens for their own protection.
6. Indefinite imprisonment of any suspected member of any organization that engages in, supports or condones terrorism anywhere in the world.
7. Confiscation of all property of any convicted member of any organization that engages in, supports or condones Islamic terrorism anywhere in the world.
8. Ending all Muslim immigration into the United States, from any country.
9. Suspension of all immigration, regardless of religious affiliation, from any member state of the Arab League.
10. Loyalty oaths for all federal employees wherein they must declare their allegiance to the constitution of the United States of America and swear adherence to Judeo-Christian ethics.
11. Loyalty oaths for all state, county and municipal employees as a condition for receipt of federal funds.
12. Deportation of all Muslims who are not US citizens.
13. A Muslim, not a citizen of the United States, who violates US immigration law will be imprisoned indefinitely.
14. Withdrawal of the United States from the United Nations and the eviction of that organization from their headquarters in New York City.

[Bringbackthedraft]

Lots of possible imprisonment talk. Where are we putting all the facilities? Who is going to man them? The internees won't be working, so they'll have to be fed, clothed washed etc.. Who is going to pay for them? Looks like many Camp Gitmos to us but to the rest of the world and the MSM they will be called Camp Auschwitzes.

[Dark Skies]

You might ask why I, as a Jew, suggest converting them to Christianity? Because I believe there are enough good Christians in this world to hold the bastards down while they learn to behave.

I stopped reading at this point, because I just have to say..."I love this guy!"

Now I'm gonna go back and read the rest of the article.

[Dark Skies]

I finished reading it and stand by my post #3.

Are we not at war? Do we owe it to our country and our families to win? Do we need to get real regarding the threat of Islam.

Er, I think the answer is h&ll yes!

[Dark Skies]

Ping

[EdReform]

BTTT (read later)

islam explained

[AmericanArchConservative]

Hmmm

WHO's been reading my postings on a regular basis?! Didn't I openly call for similar measures about a month and a half ago? Specifically roundups, internment, deportation, visa exclusions...and more?

Great Britain wasn't listening at the time, but they have apparently since begun to reconsider things - at least in part. Perhaps my good friend, the Deputy Director of Comm {DCSA Messaging, London} in the MoD knew it was my idea...

France is finally getting a bit irascible with the "Unassimilables", as well as the Netherlands. What will it take for the Germans? Maybe they ought to start with Gerhard Schroder...

Hmmm, what was the date I posted that? Fred N., do you recall? I think I want to take credit for it {of course I always DID...}

A.A.C.

"Let the Final Crusade commence!"

[EdReform]

Ping

[EdReform]

Ping

[Dark Skies]

As they say, imitation is the sincerest (I was raised to say "most sincere"...but I am a Southerner) form of flattery.

Kudos to you also, AAC, for your enduring effort on behalf of "the cause."

[Fred Nerks]

Never you mind about taking the credit for making the suggestions, I WANT TO SEE YOU MAKE IT HAPPEN! (PS, you won't have to lock them ALL up and feed them, once they know the game is up, most of them go back to where they came from.)

[Fred Nerks]

FEMA is your friend.

http://www.sonic.net/sentinel/gvcon6.html

[Dark Skies]

And Fred...regarding the Miss Finicky rules of English usage...i.e. sincerest vs. most sincere...here is the rule that I was taught.

Adjectives that have one syllable usually take -er and -est. Adjectives that have two syllables and end in y (early), ow (narrow), and le (gentle), can also take -er and -est. Almost all other adjectives with two or more syllables require the use of more and most.

Refer to #10 for anal retentive (and Southern) usage of the English language.

Thought you, being a writer, might appreciate the finer points of anal retentiveness.

[Dark Skies]

...most of them go back to where they came from.

But what does that mean for Israel?

[Fred Nerks]

No, not me, I'm a very regular writer.

[Fred Nerks]

"But what does that mean for Israel?"

Well, first of all, you protect yourself, for if you do not, you cannot offer anyone else protection.

[Dark Skies]

No, not me, I'm a very regular writer.

Ah, the joys of writing on high fiber paper.

[Fred Nerks]

LOL! I may speak English but my plumbing is German!

[Dark Skies]

I may speak English but my plumbing is German!

I think I might be German too...a little at least. I had two hot dogs with sauerkraut and mustard for din tonite (really).

[Fred Nerks]