Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pregnant Woman in Islamic Dress Assaulted, Called 'Terrorist B-tch' (CAIR promotional press release)
U.S. Newswire ^ | 8/9/05

Posted on 08/09/2005 10:17:46 AM PDT by Crackingham

A prominent national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group today called on law enforcement authorities to treat an assault this morning on a Virginia Muslim woman as a hate crime.

The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) reported that a 23-year-old Muslim woman, who is 8 months pregnant and wears and Islamic head scarf, said she was out for her morning walk in Arlington, Va., when three white men in a pick-up truck began screaming anti-Muslim and racist slurs at her. According to the victim, the men shouted, "You terrorist b- tch, go back to your country. . .You n-gger b-tch." (The woman is African-American.)

The truck drove away and then returned as the woman continued on her walk. One of the men, who was wearing military-style clothing, allegedly got out of the vehicle and began shoving the woman and preventing her from moving away. During the assault, he shouted, "You terrorist b-tch. . . We're going to kick you're a- s. . . you're nothing." The other men then called the attacker back to the truck and it sped off.

"We believe these types of incidents are the direct result of the growing level of virulent anti-Muslim rhetoric Americans are exposed to on the Internet, in newspaper editorial pages and on radio talk shows," said CAIR Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper. "Our nation's political and religious leaders must begin to challenge Islamophobic hate-mongers."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: arlingtonva; assault; bs; cair; cairpressrelease; fraud; imaginary; muslimwomen; propaganda; sticksandstones; talltale; whiningwahabbists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-314 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator

To: r9etb
r9etb wrote:
Leaving that aside, however, I find it rather disturbing that there are more than a few so-called men on this thread who seem to be applauding the alleged incident.

REPLY:

Personally I found you comment to be offensive, broad brushing and elitists.

You comment leads me to believe that you have an huge over sensitivity to anything male.

Many women with this dreaded attitude have stopped receiving the prescribed treatments for penis complex.

To Admin Moderator:

In the future you will have to make sure that FReepers like me get a big dose of sensitivity and diversity training so thin skinned individuals will not be offended.
102 posted on 08/09/2005 10:52:38 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Have Ruck - Will Travel
"needs to be found and punished as severely as the law will allow"

Why would calling someone a name and hurting their feelings be punishable at all? What the hell ever happened to free speech?

Are we all a bunch of wusses in this country, that we are offended if somebody doesn't like us?
103 posted on 08/09/2005 10:52:39 AM PDT by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: r9etb; hugoball

"Supposing that this story is true (there's no evidence either way), are you actually trying to justify what these guys did?"

Nope. muslims want to be the ones to beat their women, they don't want help.
Boycotting muslim owned business, and the occassional harrassment of adult males.... acceptable in my book.


104 posted on 08/09/2005 10:52:52 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Excellent point.


105 posted on 08/09/2005 10:53:18 AM PDT by Sweetjustusnow (Help Kill Senate Bill 54....NOW. Another Property Rights Infringement. (Update: TOO LATE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: hugoball

CAIR is trying to invent excuses to deny the 1st amendment right of free speech to people who speak out against their Jihad agenda i.e. Mr. Graham


106 posted on 08/09/2005 10:53:30 AM PDT by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: fortunecookie

She was called NAMES!!! Awwwwwwwwwww. How TWAMATIC! She can go to a shrink---oh, that's right, as Muslim property she can't do that!
See- the world knows what that headscarf stands for now. We got the message REAL CLEAR. It stands for Islam- Islam that hates everything but Islam. So now we're hating it back.
Funny how people who cheered 9-11 and every other atrocity committed by Islam are all sensitive about words! Sawing heads off doesn't affect them. Namecalling-HORRORS!
We don't define ugly and offensive the same way at all, do we?
They are beginning to reap what they sowed for centuries-and cause and effect will be terrible.
How can they logically expect anything less?


107 posted on 08/09/2005 10:55:47 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker

Under circumstances of a nuclear attack, things like vigilante justice just happen.


108 posted on 08/09/2005 10:55:48 AM PDT by DarthVader (Islam is not something to be understood, it is something that must be utterly destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

I saw a girl yesterday with a head scarf on....wearing Levis and a short sleave shirt.... I didnt see any bomb belts so I figured she was okay.


109 posted on 08/09/2005 10:59:22 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This is wrong no matter whatever faith this woman subscribes to. If it were a Christian woman in the story and she was being harrassed by muslims. I'm sure that the people here would not be asking for the same standard of evidence before showing a modicum of human concern over the issue.

As Christians we need to lead by good example and keep our sense of right and wrong in troubled times.


110 posted on 08/09/2005 10:59:47 AM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Maybe that baby had wires and a detonator?


111 posted on 08/09/2005 10:59:48 AM PDT by Sweetjustusnow (Help Kill Senate Bill 54....NOW. Another Property Rights Infringement. (Update: TOO LATE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: babygene

Anyone who accosts a pregnant woman is a coward in my book. Whether he does it with words or something more substantial makes no difference. A coward is a coward, period.


112 posted on 08/09/2005 11:01:49 AM PDT by Have Ruck - Will Travel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

Comment #113 Removed by Moderator

To: Mad Mammoth
Thats funny and as a Baptist do not find it offensive.

Why are so many thin skinned posters coming out like good sheeple and condemning all men because they are not sensitive to another Dan Rather type report.
114 posted on 08/09/2005 11:04:10 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
Personally I found you comment to be offensive, broad brushing and elitists.

Gosh. How sad. Here I was responding to actual comments on this very thread, and you're all offended that I should notice that some so-called "men" (are you among them?) seem to be in applauding the alleged incident.

Now, there is ample reason to doubt that this story is true. However, it does not relieve you, or anybody else, of the responsibility for recognizing that such an incident, were it to actually occur, would be wrong.

And yet you appear to find it impossible to own up to what should have been obvious. Instead, your silly response indicates to me that you have yet to achieve those traits that separate a grown man from a merely physically-mature male.

115 posted on 08/09/2005 11:05:06 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

Comment #116 Removed by Moderator

To: Phantom Lord

Wasn't it none other than Jane Roe and her supporters who set fire to the safe house where Roe was supposedly hiding from the militant, religious, right-wing nuts and blamed them for the deed?


117 posted on 08/09/2005 11:06:01 AM PDT by Old Professer (As darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good; innocence is blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader
Would it happen? You bet.

However, back to the topic at hand (the article), I say the whole story is made up. Mooseslimes are supposed to lie to us "Infidels" if it suits their purposes and this little incident is just too pat. Fails the smell test miserably.
118 posted on 08/09/2005 11:07:14 AM PDT by RebelBanker (We want the glacier back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

Comment #119 Removed by Moderator

To: Tempest

"Right" is getting rid of people who want to kill us.


120 posted on 08/09/2005 11:08:17 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson