Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 08-05-05 (Pied Piper Pitt Contradicts Himself AGAIN)
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | August 5, 2005 | William Rivers Pitt, DUmmies, and PJ-Comix

Posted on 08/05/2005 6:55:33 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

It looks like Pied Piper Pitt needs to break out in song to sing “Self-Recanted Evening” since he has contradicted himself YET AGAIN as you can see in this DUmmie THREAD titled, “Before the 'Hackett Wuz Robbed' train gets really rolling...” Pitt makes it appear that the Left is making themselves appear ridiculous by claiming that every election they have lost was stolen. However, a couple of days before making this post, Pitt made his infamous Sound Of Distant Thunder post in which he proudly claimed that he stood on the Capitol steps in May 2001 with a bunch of fellow loonies protesting “the illegitimate delivery of the presidency to George W. Bush.” Sorry, Pitt. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t now be self-righteously proclaiming that it is wrong to claim elections are stolen when you folks lose and at the same time still claim that Election 2000 was stolen. NO recount ever showed Gore ahead in Florida. Following the election, several major LIBERAL newspapers carefully checked the voting results. Their conclusion: Bush won. And yet despite ALL the evidence showing that result, Pitt still proudly boasts of his participation in a demonstration protesting that “stolen” election. So let us now watch Pitt contradict himself once again in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, humming “Self-Recanted Evening” from atop a Diebold machine, is in the [brackets]:

Before the 'Hackett Wuz Robbed' train gets really rolling...I'd like to ask:

[“Why do I keep contradicting myself?”]

Is every election we lose going to be called stolen from now on?

[You helped set the ball in motion, Pitt, by contesting the 2000 election results.]

I've been dealing with local elections since I was a little kid. My mom held a small office in our town and worked with the Mayor, who ran every term for 22 years. We were there every election night listening to the results come in and go up on the board. Results from districts would come in late and dramatically change the count. It happened all the time, and it wasn't fraud.

I think everyone is correct to be suspicious of elections these days. But I would offer also a word of caution: What happened here with Hackett is not unusual. Before the accusation of fraud is made as a declarative fact, some proof beyond conjecture and disappointment would be a good thing.

[That was Pied Piper Pitt posting on Aug. 4 at 11:05 AM. Here is what Pied Piper Pitt posted on Aug. 2 at 3:37 PM: “It seems a million years hence that I stood upon the steps of the Capitol Building in May of 2001 with thousands of other activists to protest the illegitimate delivery of the presidency to George W. Bush.”]

I won't be calling it fraud. But the evidence points to questionable proc As long as the Ohio elections board operates with such questionable procedures and equipment, I think it's a fair question to ask:

How do we know the vote in Ohio is fair? We don't.

[How do we know you are sane? We don’t.]

That late surge came from Schmidt's home county.

[You shouldn’t have said that, Pitt. You have only stoked the DUmmie paranoid fires.]

The only irregularity I'm aware of is that they had to hand count part of Clermont because of high humidity

[But isn’t hand counting what you DUmmies have been screeching for all along? And now you are COMPLAINING about a hand count?]

In four minutes, four thousand votes appear? I think the more important question is William, why you seem more interested in quieting legitimate discussion and/or skepticism, and appear resistant to looking at the reality that Republicans have in fact (as wild as this may sound) been known to engage in dishonest activities once in a blue moon.

[The answer to your question is that Pied Piper Pitt is trying to mainstream himself to be more acceptable for press interviews. Unfortunately, for Pitt, that is an IMPOSSIBLE task since his own melodramatic writings are a bloated paper trail in wackiness. His laughable essay about a Third American Empire that began at the end of an Olympic hockey game is enough in itself to have him laughed off most TV interview shows before he even sets foot there.]

May God strike me dead and poop on my face if I do.

[Do what, Pitt? If it is contradicting yourself, then you better wipe that poop off your face with your cold dead fingers.]

Well, whaddya expect after the last 2 presidential elections were outright STOLEN??? Democracy is America is dead...

[We know for sure that Pied Piper Pitt has proclaimed, without a shred of evidence, that Election 2000 was stolen.]

Hey Will Pitt! I believe we've been down this road, Ohio ring a bell in 2004!!! The people need a voice to decide wheter paperless verification for voting machines has proven it's something that should or should not be mandatory!

[You had hand counting in part of Clermont county and you DUmmies cited THAT as proof of election fraud. Heads you lose; Tails you STILL lose.]

why does every election seem to have fishy things happen? why after all day of basically 50/50 do the machines go down and suddenly 91 precincts need to be hand counted? and why are those particular precincts the ones that are heavily for schmidt? in fact just about the amount needed to give victory and ensure no automatic recount?

[Why is Karl Rove spotted in the Kinko’s of every contested election district?]

There are many people here on DU who simply can't fathom the possibility that a Republican could get more votes that a Democrat in a fair election. They believe that a majority of voters have similar political views to them. The only way to they can rationalize election results is accept the idea that the election was stolen. This started immediately after the mid-term elections of 2002.

[LOUSY FREEPER TROLL!!!]

I am old enough to remember President Eisenhour, actually President Truman also, although it gets a little fuzzy there. Anyway, this is an entirely different time, yes we had corruption back then too, but nothing like the times we are in today. I have never, never seen it this bad. For me, your type of thinking is now long gone, I've taken off my rose colored glasses.

[Ah yes! Those were the days of CLEAN elections especially in the 1948 Senate race from Texas where Landslide Lyndon won thanks to 202 extra votes found form him in the town of Alice in Box 13.]

Weren't reporters booted from one of the vote tabulation places? Was there an explanation for that?

[Yes. Their incessant farting became unbearable so they were booted.]

very fishy circumstances, long neocon history of fraud. Hence, fraud until proven otherwise, since there are big red flags of fraud.

[Hence, Republicans are GUILTY of fraud until proven otherwise.]

Yes every election we lose is stolen.

[That’s it. The very fact that you lose is PROOF of fraud.]

I would suggest that every election - win lose or draw - be called stolen until such time as voter-verified paper balloting is implemented.

[Except when Democrats win.]

I'm not following the story, at all, but I no longer believe any election at face value. Sad, but true. We're completely f***** here in the USA, where are votes are corporate secrets.

[Did you get your Diebold Secret Decoder Ring?]

We cannot afford to be the little boy who cried wolf If we cry "We Wuz Robbed" after every election we may soon lose our credibility.

[Losing your credibility is something that already happened to the DUmmies long ago.]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: dummies; williampitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: SCALEMAN

NICE tagline!


41 posted on 08/05/2005 8:34:17 AM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (I can't use the cell phone in the car. I have to keep my hands free for making obscene gestures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: gate2wire

Thread down the memory hole


42 posted on 08/05/2005 8:50:07 AM PDT by NRA1995 ("People do stupid things...." and I hear the Vonage music playing.....woo-hoo, woo-hoo-hoo....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us

One of my neighbors is a member of the MIHOP Brigade. I didn't mention my political leanings when he said Bush was the culprit in 9/11. I started pointing out all the reasons that was false, after about ten minutes he just sort of slinked away. He hasn'tspoken to me since last September.


43 posted on 08/05/2005 8:53:30 AM PDT by Hawk1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SCALEMAN

Five years old watching the election? Didn't you have anything better to do back then?:) Note: I say that as someone who first became interested in politics during the '92 election at eight years old.:)


44 posted on 08/05/2005 9:22:22 AM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (DU's new motto: "You shall not question our patriotism, you filthy American scum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
It looks like Pied Piper Pitt needs to break out in song to sing "Self-Recanted Evening". . . .

SELF-RECANTED EVENING
Tune: "Some Enchanted Evening"

Self-recanted evening,
When you see the flip-flops,
You may see where Pitt stops
Across the DUmmieland.
And somehow you know,
You know even then,
That sometime you'll see him
Recant once again.

Self-aggrandized weaving,
Bloviating windbag,
Going where the wind blows,
Not knowing where to stand.
He'll write to the left--
That's left to go right--
Will's so busy dancing,
He can't sleep at night.

Who can explain Pitt?
Who can tell you why?
Will gives two versions,
Neither one can fly.

Some fantastic FReeping!
Someone may be laughing,
You may hear the laughing
Among the DUFU fans.
And night after night,
When we go to bed,
That sound is our laughter--
Will Pitt's in our thread!

Once we have DUFUed
Will Pitt's swing and miss,
Then he'll discover
He can't recant this!

45 posted on 08/05/2005 9:38:41 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (The wag tailoring the doggerel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I would suggest that every election - win lose or draw - be called stolen until such time as voter-verified paper balloting is implemented.

[Except when Democrats win.]

Very prescient, but also very disturbing when you think about it. That kind of mentality is difficult to understand, and certainly not healthy for the country.

NFP

46 posted on 08/05/2005 9:38:48 AM PDT by Notforprophet (Democrats have stood their own arguments on their heads so often that they now stand for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
NO recount ever showed Gore ahead in Florida.

THE PALM BEACH POKEY
Tune: The Hokey Pokey

You put your stylus in,
You put your stylus out,
You put your stylus in,
And you punch Buchanan out.
You do the Palm Beach Pokey
And you turn the count around,
That’s what it’s all about!

You put the Gore votes in,
You put the Bush votes out,
You put the Gore votes in,
And you do another count.
You do the Palm Beach Pokey
And you turn the count around,
That’s what it’s all about!

You bring your lawyers in,
You drag the whole thing out,
You bring your lawyers in,
And you put it all in doubt.
You do the Palm Beach Pokey
And you turn the count around,
That’s what it’s all about!

You let your doctors spin,
You let the pundits spout,
You let your doctors spin,
And your people whine and pout.
You do the Palm Beach Pokey
And you turn the count around,
That’s what it’s all about!

You do the Palm Beach Pokey,
You do the Palm Beach Pokey,
You do the Palm Beach Pokey,
That’s what it’s all about!

Charlie Henrickson, copyright 2000

47 posted on 08/05/2005 9:44:00 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (The wag tailoring the doggerel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
the 'Hackett Wuz Robbed' train . . .

A real loco motive.

48 posted on 08/05/2005 9:50:55 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (I choo-choo-choose you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Before the accusation of fraud is made as a declarative fact, some proof beyond conjecture and disappointment would be a good thing.

"PROOF? We don' need no steenkin' PROOF!"


49 posted on 08/05/2005 9:55:25 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Lack of proof has never stopped you before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
How do we know the vote in Ohio is fair? We don't.

Allow me to point out this basic principle once again: The burden of proof (onus probationis) is on the accuser--in this case, to prove that it was not fair.

50 posted on 08/05/2005 9:59:05 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Prove that it was NOT fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

"If we cry "We Wuz Robbed" after every election we may soon lose our credibility."

What credibility?


51 posted on 08/05/2005 10:04:15 AM PDT by mondonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
May God strike me dead and poop on my face if I do.

Pitty pooper.

52 posted on 08/05/2005 10:05:48 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Bull Pitt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
why are those particular precincts the ones that are heavily for schmidt?

Hey, Schmidt happens.

53 posted on 08/05/2005 10:09:30 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Those precincts are full of Schmidt voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
why does every election seem to have fishy things happen?

Just for the halibut.

Or rather, just for the Halliburton.

54 posted on 08/05/2005 10:12:00 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Quit carping about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Republicans have in fact (as wild as this may sound) been known to engage in dishonest activities once in a blue moon. . . . long neocon history of fraud.

DUmmie projection. The Dems are the longtime masters of vote fraud.

55 posted on 08/05/2005 10:18:20 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Dems have engaged in fraud many times in blue states and cities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix; franksolich; ReeWalker
there are big red flags of fraud.

Hey, Skinner said no more talking about the Andy Stephenson Situation!

56 posted on 08/05/2005 10:21:21 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (More red flags than Red Square on May Day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

According to the Machinery of Democracy exhibit of the Museum of American History (americanhistory.si.edu), Clermont County in Ohio uses Optical Scan voting equipment. They way optical scan works is just like the SAT tests. Fill in the oval, and a machine reads the ballots. So they have a paper trail that can be machine counted or hand counted. AND, as we learned during the election last year, EVERY Ohio county has two election surpervisors, one Republican and one Democrat. Good luck getting the Democrat to go along with vote fraud in favor of the Republican, or vice versa.

My God, they really are DUmmies...


57 posted on 08/05/2005 10:24:46 AM PDT by Tatze (I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix; KJC1
Sorry, Pitt. You can't have it both ways.

He's trying. Pitt's dancing as fast as he can.


58 posted on 08/05/2005 10:35:09 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Pitt, stop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

A DUmmy parody

http://wuzzadem.typepad.com/wuz/2005/08/du_hackett_vict.html


59 posted on 08/05/2005 10:59:35 AM PDT by hattend (Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
There are many people here on DU who simply can't fathom the possibility that a Republican could get more votes that a Democrat in a fair election

I noticed that not ONE person addressed the L.F.T. (Lousy Freeper Troll) on this issue! I notice that a LOT!

Seems like almost any time a person raises a valid, rational point that goes against what they want to hear, it's either ignored or the person is battered, beaten, and sometimes banned!

60 posted on 08/05/2005 11:01:20 AM PDT by RogerWilko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson