[mlc9852]

Why is it when evolution is discussed, the subject of God always comes up? It doesn't come up when discussing calculus, geology, astrophysics, or any other scientific discipline. Why?

[nmh]

"The angry evolutionists were especially interesting, as they often wound up admitting implicitly that their real agenda was atheism -- while denying that there was any social policy message in that agenda."

It doesn't matter how many faulty measuring tools used for dating. It doesn't matter how many atheists and ignorant polly parrots echo evolution ... it doesn't make it so. Truth is not dependent on numbers of people believing it. The evidence of God is obvious to all that wish to see it. Either you believe an unlimited God who can do anything, as stated in the Bible or you believe limited man who denies Him with a diametrically opposing theory. There is NO middle ground or compromise when it comes to truth. Compromised truth is NO longer truth.

[cyborg]

I don't believe in evolution. Understanding the theory is crucial, not the belief. I still had to learn it to pass college biology but no prof is going to convince me I'm descended from a chimp.

[Junior]

Pingaling.

[JamesP81]

I have heard it said, by an engineer, no less, that if a genetic mutation occurred every nanosecond for the past 4 billion years that there still would not have been enough time for humanity to evolve from single cell organisms.

True? I don't know. But I know enough that the idea that evolution is somehow a proven fact is nearly as laughable as stating that the Earth orbits the moon. Mathematically, since all things in the universe are relative, this can be shown, but that doesn't make it so.

[mrjeff]

This article is complete nonsense; riddled with logical errors. I wrote an extensive post on my blog about it.

[R.W.Ratikal]

So the world began with a Big Bang? So who do you suppose caused the Big Bang?

Secular humanism has one major flaw: it has no beginning.

[theBuckwheat]

>> perhaps it might be more prudent to check the accuracy of the theology,<<

Perhaps it might be more prudent of the evolutionists to check the accuracy of their belief in a system that cannot demonstrate how life came about from non-life.

[From many - one.]

read later

[RightWhale]

It's not much of a theory, scientifically speaking, since it has next to no math.

[wallcrawlr]

Heres one for the weekend.

Revelation 4:11
See my profile for info

[Sloth]

Each journal contains at least ten articles of about 2-20 pages, and each of those articles represents several months' or years' work by a team of trained biologists whose most compelling material and moral interest would be to disprove the work of all their predecessors and to make an immortal name by doing so.

Nope. Their greatest interest is in getting tenure, or being well-thought-of by their peers, and that's not going to happen if they deny the tenets of the faith.

Geology, physical anthropology, agricultural science, environmental science, much of chemistry, some areas of physics (e.g. protein folding) and even disciplines such as climatology and oceanography ... are at least partially founded on evolution. ... and be prepared to swallow the billions of human deaths that might follow the abandonment of the foundations of medical, mining, environmental, agricultural, and climatological knowledge.

Grossly exaggerates the importance of evolution.

[Tribune7]

By the theory of evolution I mean the origination of new species from common ancestral forms by an iterated process of genetic mutation, natural selection, and hereditary transmission, whereby the frequencies of newly altered, repeated, and old genes and introns in a given lineage can cross ecological, structural, and behavioral thresholds that radically separate one species from another.

I don't there is any argument that dogs and wolves -- different species that they are -- share a common ancestor. I think the argument starts with claims that the dog shares an acestor with a cat -- much less fish, dragonfly or oak tree.

[chariotdriver]

The only thing more absurd than divine designer creationism biblical model of the the universe and the creation of mankind

Are the atheistic bigbang evolution theories (based on sciences that while somewhat workable are mostly unproved) and that life arose on its own causality before where was nothing and that man has descended from a long line of ape like creatures.