Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Author: Al-Qaida Has Nuclear Weapons Inside U.S.
Newsmax ^ | July 14, 2005 | Stewart Stogel

Posted on 07/13/2005 4:37:32 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 07/13/2005 4:37:33 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
Paul Williams is on Michael Savage as I type this (Streaming on kernradio.com)
2 posted on 07/13/2005 4:38:37 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

3 posted on 07/13/2005 4:39:07 PM PDT by MarkeyD (I really, really loathe liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

It sells books, I suppose.

Investigative journalist?


4 posted on 07/13/2005 4:39:59 PM PDT by Sally Golightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

fyi ---

The author was just on with Savage , was on Coast to Coast AM with George Noury last night..

Book doesn't come out until September.


5 posted on 07/13/2005 4:40:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

If there really were 6 suitcase nukes detonated in the US, can you imagine the backlash? Can you imagine what people would demand as payback?


6 posted on 07/13/2005 4:40:49 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socratic; Echo Talon; kingu; Quix

Pinging.


7 posted on 07/13/2005 4:41:15 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

WND doesn't understand Physics.

Suitcase nukes are SMALLER than ordinary nukes.

The smaller the nuke, the shorter the shelf life.

The less shielding that you have, the sooner that your electronics and conventional explosives deteriorate from the radiation.

The less fissionable material that you have, the faster you generally need your atomic trigger isotopes to emit neutrons. The faster you emit neutrons, the shorter your half-life. The shorter your half-life, the less time that you have before the nuke simply fizzles instead of booms.

This is simple physics. Moreover, heavy metals like uranium and plutonium are among the most brittle materials known to man, and the slightest bit of humidity turns them into uranium oxide or plutonium oxide (i.e. worthless rust).

So a "suitcase nuke" from 1991 (the fall of the CCCP) is likely little more than a rusted, shattered, fragmented collection of wiring and explosives today.

8 posted on 07/13/2005 4:41:31 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Very scary. Anyone know how credible the source is?


9 posted on 07/13/2005 4:42:04 PM PDT by Huntress (Possession really is nine tenths of the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

Williams is meeting with Tancredo tomorrow.


10 posted on 07/13/2005 4:43:11 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
A scary thought.

However, had AlQueda already smuggled nukes into the states, they would have used them by now.

Not that I'm saying we shouldn't do everything possible to make sure they don't get them or bring them in. Sealing the border (for real) would be a good start. Shutting down Iran's and North Korea's nuclear ambitions (by any means necessary) would be a good next step.

11 posted on 07/13/2005 4:43:11 PM PDT by pillbox_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD

When and if we get hit with a Nuclear device, I myself would not want to be a resident of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, Syria!


12 posted on 07/13/2005 4:44:16 PM PDT by rocksblues (I support the war on terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
Among those discussed: Boston, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Philadelphia, Miami, Washington and Rappahannock County, Va.

NO New York?

13 posted on 07/13/2005 4:44:30 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

Mecca will surely be dust...


14 posted on 07/13/2005 4:45:04 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

Mecca will surely be dust...


15 posted on 07/13/2005 4:45:08 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
And how could al-Qaida manage to transport such weapons into the U.S.?

They probaly found it much more difficult than the agents of the (former) USSR.

16 posted on 07/13/2005 4:45:21 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Some people may laugh, but I am genuinely concerned about the possibility of some kind of nuclear hit here. It might not be exactly as Williams has described, but the threat is real. If we thought 9-11 changed the world forever, just think what a nuclear detonation would do.


17 posted on 07/13/2005 4:45:52 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Thank you for your sensible post.

I am a lot more worried about the dirty bomb scenario than the mythical "suitcase nuke".


18 posted on 07/13/2005 4:45:57 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

Starting with Mecca.


19 posted on 07/13/2005 4:47:06 PM PDT by MarkeyD (I really, really loathe liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Argus
"I am a lot more worried about the dirty bomb scenario than the mythical "suitcase nuke"."

Yes, the "dirty bomb" will almost certainly happen. But a real atomic explosion? No way.

20 posted on 07/13/2005 4:47:25 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson