You are overreacting as this thread indicates -- people tend to make a lot of mistakes and ping themselves way too much.
Then someone joins in with the La Raza comment which is just not true.
Credibility comes into question because the source you are using -- wouldn't believe those people if they told me the sky was blue.
Think you should settle down instead of getting all worked up about something that has not happened.
My deep and profound concern really comes from Gonzales' specific failure to join with Kelo on the New London landmark Private Property 5th Amendment TAKINGS case while WH Counsel, and his office having sided with the City ("the takers") and its allies.
If so, as I was told, this represents a grave weakness on Property Rights, both as WH COunsel, and as AG, and as a potential USSC nominee.
My deep and profound concern really comes from Gonzales' specific failure to join with Kelo on the New London landmark Private Property 5th Amendment TAKINGS case while WH Counsel, and his office having sided with the City ("the takers") and its allies.
If so, as I was told, this represents a grave weakness on Property Rights, both as WH COunsel, and as AG, and as a potential USSC nominee.
Overreacting? Not happened yet? In my opinion, almost nothing is as cirically important as a lifetime USSC appointment. (Look at GHWB's deeply regrettable, for decades to come, appointment of "Stealth" Justice David Souter, if you don't get the point.)
An ounce of prevention is worth more than a ton of cure, Mom. At least my Mom says so..
<;^)
Best regards, FTP