Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Heads up, Freepers!
1 posted on 07/06/2005 3:17:36 PM PDT by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FReethesheeples

Judical Acitivism by Gonzales BUMP!


2 posted on 07/06/2005 3:18:44 PM PDT by FReethesheeples (Gonzales iappears to be quite WEAK on Property rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

Gonzales is NOT a Conservative Bump!


3 posted on 07/06/2005 3:19:12 PM PDT by FReethesheeples (Gonzales iappears to be quite WEAK on Property rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

Gonzales is NOT an Originalist BUMP!


4 posted on 07/06/2005 3:19:41 PM PDT by FReethesheeples (Gonzales iappears to be quite WEAK on Property rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

He won't be nominated for SCOTUS, so find something else to vent your spleen about.


5 posted on 07/06/2005 3:19:55 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

Gonzales is WEAK on Protecting Private Property Rights Bump!
(Based upon his record.)


7 posted on 07/06/2005 3:21:46 PM PDT by FReethesheeples (Gonzales iappears to be quite WEAK on Property rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples
Secondly, a quick search found this case where Gonzales joined the majority in SHARPLY opposing Janet Rogers Brown's dissent (they were both on the Texas Supreme Court at the time) (Source: People for te American Way, via Google search)

Something is messed up here. Janice Brown did not serve on the Texas Supreme Court with Gonzales. She is a Supreme Court Jurist from California. She left California today to take up her new gig in Washington.

8 posted on 07/06/2005 3:22:40 PM PDT by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

When was Janice Rogers Brown on the Texas Supreme Court?


9 posted on 07/06/2005 3:22:43 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

Gonzles has extensive strong written criticisms of Priscilla Owen and Jance Rogers Brown, enough to be extensively documented by the Ultra-liberal People for the American Way. (Link above.)


10 posted on 07/06/2005 3:23:27 PM PDT by FReethesheeples (Gonzales iappears to be quite WEAK on Property rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

Another Hispanic-bad thread.... yawn.


15 posted on 07/06/2005 3:30:18 PM PDT by Porterville (Don't make me go Bushi on your a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

Secondly, a quick search found this case where Gonzalies joned the majority in SHARPLY opposing Janet Rogers Brown's dissent (they were both on the Texas Supreme Court at the time) (Source: People for te American Way, via Google search):



LOL..... Yep they are so busy spewing misinformation they can't even get the correct judge on the SCOT.... sure makes their attempt seem vain...


17 posted on 07/06/2005 3:31:30 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples
Not to worry...we have this promise

I'll pick people who one, can do the job; people who are honest, people who are bright; and people who will strictly interpret the Constitution and not use the bench to legislate from. That's what I campaigned on, and that's what I'm going to do."

President George Bush- Wed. July 6,2005

19 posted on 07/06/2005 3:31:49 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Does the Red Crescent have falafel dollies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

La Raza Gonzales is weak on lots of things.


20 posted on 07/06/2005 3:33:19 PM PDT by k2blader (Was it wrong to kill Terri Shiavo? YES - 83.8%. FR Opinion Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples
Your source is the 'people for the American way'? I would not believe them if their brains came notarized.
23 posted on 07/06/2005 3:37:54 PM PDT by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

Well I would have to study those cases to see the particulars. But guess what? Why bother. Gonzales hasn't even been nominated yet. There are also plenty of other issues besides this one to look at. Sorry.


26 posted on 07/06/2005 3:41:06 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

Not good news, especially if he is the SC nominee.


29 posted on 07/06/2005 3:44:36 PM PDT by Sanguis Christi victor daemon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples
Alberto Gonzales is definitely against apprehending and returning illegal alians where they came from. He basically admitted that during an interview on the Sean hanitty Show.

He is Not Supreme Court material.
42 posted on 07/06/2005 3:58:28 PM PDT by puppypusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples
Image hosted by Photobucket.com and he's damn sure NO friend to gun owners either!!!
59 posted on 07/06/2005 4:29:38 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReethesheeples

You need to calm down and quit double posting -- nothing is worth getting this upset about. Go take some deep breaths!


66 posted on 07/06/2005 5:30:06 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson