Is Alberto Gonzales Weak on Private Property Rights? YES!!!

1) WH Office of general counsel records, 2) People for the Aemrican Way Website (Compiles statements ^ | 7/6/05 | FreetheSheeples

[Texas Federalist]

You can't criticize the views of any Hispanic person?

[puppypusher]

Alberto Gonzales is definitely against apprehending and returning illegal alians where they came from. He basically admitted that during an interview on the Sean hanitty Show.

He is Not Supreme Court material.

[FReethesheeples]

Ok. Heads up nevertheless.

[FReethesheeples]

My deep and profound concern really comes from Gonzales' specific failure to join with Kelo on the New London landmark Private Property 5th Amendment TAKINGS case while WH Counsel, and his office having sided with the City ("the takers") and its allies.

If so, as I was told, this represents a grave weakness on Property Rights, both as WH COunsel, and as AG, and as a potential USSC nominee.

[FReethesheeples]

My deep and profound concern really comes from Gonzales' specific failure to join with Kelo on the New London landmark Private Property 5th Amendment TAKINGS case while WH Counsel, and his office having sided with the City ("the takers") and its allies.

If so, as I was told, this represents a grave weakness on Property Rights, both as WH COunsel, and as AG, and as a potential USSC nominee.

[FReethesheeples]

Another good point. Thanks.

[FReethesheeples]

George W. Bush always tells the truth, I think.

[roylene]

I understand direct quotes, and know that anything anyone says or writes can be placed in a different context and made to sound as one wishes.
I can also say that I have listened to and read what these people have said.
My reaction is still the same.
They are untrustworthy at best and devoid of morality and ethics at least.
Their concept of the United States is distorted and skewed beyond the recognition of the Founding Fathers.

[k2blader]

La Raza supports Gonzales:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1289864/posts

Here are a couple threads about his position towards the 2nd Amendment:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1329455/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1325501/posts

[FReethesheeples]

I may have misunderstood the nature of your comments. I thought you were implying that I was merely criticising Gonzales for his ehtnicity. You apparently mneant something quite different. I am truly sorry that I took your comments wrongly and hereby withdraw my Abuse filing.

Apparently we both AGREE on the policy matters (and Alberto G.'s historical writings) in making him a suboptimal choice for the Court.
Sorry again for misconsturing your remark.

[FReethesheeples]

Excellent links on La Raza and Gonzoles being weak on the 2nd Amendment (Right to Bear Arms).

The Right to Bear Arms is certainly related in some manner to the Right to Protect Private Property from Arbitrary Takings (5th Amendment, last sentence).

Many thanks!

[Texas Federalist]

I think you meant to send post 50 to Porterville.

[Dad yer funny]

I recall something about securing the borders,though , said by W in State of the Union after September 11th,2001 , oh well , not very important , nevermind , I'm just a stickler for kooky little details that don't matter.......

[FReethesheeples]

Overreacting? Not happened yet? In my opinion, almost nothing is as cirically important as a lifetime USSC appointment. (Look at GHWB's deeply regrettable, for decades to come, appointment of "Stealth" Justice David Souter, if you don't get the point.)

An ounce of prevention is worth more than a ton of cure, Mom. At least my Mom says so..

<;^)

Best regards, FTP

[FReethesheeples]

Context, smontext. Read them.

Res ipsa loquitur. ("The thing speaks for itself.")

I will concede, however, that Gonzales has said many, many worthy and excellent things,

---- its just when he goes off the Strict constructionist reservation (often enough) as a Judical Activist (yes) that he becomes clearly dangerous and undesirable as a potential USSC nominee.

[FReethesheeples]

Thanks for the Hannity show information re: Gonzales' comments on illegal aliens.

[FReethesheeples]

Quoting you:

La Raza supports Gonzales:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1289864/posts

Here are a couple threads about his position towards the 2nd Amendment:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1329455/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1325501/posts

Thanks again for this information and these links, particularly on the 2nd Amendment.

[FReethesheeples]

Responded to extensively. Corrected 3 times.

[Chode]

and he's damn sure NO friend to gun owners either!!!

[FReethesheeples]

I MAY have misunderstood the nature of your comments. I don't think so, however.

I thought you were implying that I was merely criticising Gonzales for his ethnicity, as implied by the "Another Sipanic BAD Hispanic Thread-- Yawn" comment.

Apparently at least one other poster thinks we both AGREE on the policy matters (and Alberto G.'s historical writings) in making him a suboptimal choice for the Court.

Sorry again for misconsturing your remark, IF I did, which, upon re-re-reading I don't think I did.

50 posted on 07/06/2005 4:10:32 PM PDT by FReethesheeples (Gonzales iappears to be quite WEAK on Property rights!)