AFAIK, few creationists dispute microevolution which is readily observable.
afaik?
Right, the cartoon is very exxagerated.
But creationists never explain the magic cutoff switch that keeps all those "micro" changes from adding up to a "macro" change.
You clearly don't have much experience with creationists.
Whenever the evolution of antibiotic resistance is discusssed on these threads, almost without fail several ardent creationists try to claim that the resistance "must have" somehow been "in" the bacterial genome to start with, because (they assert) it's "impossible" for evolution to produce any new beneficial functionality.
They're dead wrong, and just ignorantly repeating lies told to them by other creationists, but they're absolutely certain that they know more about the subject than the biologists who actually research these things.