Posted on 07/05/2005 3:26:07 PM PDT by hipaatwo
Edited on 07/05/2005 3:55:31 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Q: You
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...
Still throwing the spaghetti, eh, Larry?
And I'd like to hear Larry answer the question that many (including Rush) have asked - if the media, particularly the NYT and the Times, had information implicating Rove in a crime before the 2004 election, why did they cover it up?
Were they protecting Rove? Trying to elect W again? (I think not....)
You can see the meltdown on my homepage:
http://homepage.mac.com/rlmorel/iMovieTheater49.html
The Republicans should send this guy MONEY!!!!!!!
I said on another thread my gut feeling it's Colin Powell.
1. Do you understand that you are being had by Rove yet again?
2. ditto
3. ditto
you forgot your thorazine today
Wow, Larry must figure this is his ticket back to the mainstream after his creepy liar moment.
Actually, when you've got a lawyer NOT choosing his words that carefully it's time to get a new lawyer. My guess is there are no sources...the reporters just made it up....again.
If these reporters knew it was Rove, they would have exposed him during the election to help Kerry win the precidency for all the other democrat liberals like them.
Absolutely!!
Yeah, Larry, they decided to "reveal" this for the umpteenth time.
Here's a liberal column from over a year ago:
Even JOE WILSON admitted it wasn't Rove - in 2003 -- http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/29/novak.cia/
| Spy at Center of Leak Case Still in Shadow | ||
-- Is posing for a two-page spread in Vanity Faire discreet?  |
||
Your wonderful! Thanks!
Thanks for the kind words.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.