To: rightfielder
I don't think anyone (at least not here on Freerepublic) argue that Saddam *never* had WMD's - But the fact is Saddam did not have an *active* WMD program that was currently producing WMDs like we expected he would have.
Of course he had WMDs from the late 80's and early 90's - However our CIA was certain that Saddam was still producing WMDs as soon ago as 2003 - This has turned out not to be the case it seems.
To: rightfielder
Welcome to FR by the way!
5 posted on
06/08/2005 1:02:40 PM PDT by
RushCrush
(Never give in! Never, never, never, never! Never yield in any way great or small.)
To: rightfielder
Is Chlorine and Mustard Gas considered WMDs?
Nitro, RPGs, C4?
That's just a small list of what we found.....
6 posted on
06/08/2005 1:05:58 PM PDT by
Dashing Dasher
(Ailerons make the world go 'round!)
To: rightfielder
I have one word: Halabja.
12 posted on
06/08/2005 1:19:33 PM PDT by
mewzilla
To: rightfielder
The liberal gospel on this is simple:
Saddam never had WMD, and we were the ones who gave them to him.
18 posted on
06/08/2005 4:55:53 PM PDT by
Darkwolf377
(Dems, the annoying vegetarians of politics)
To: rightfielder
People forget that Saddam admitted to having WMDs to the UN. He even gave them a list. He was supposed to destroy them and provide proof to the UN that he had done so.
19 posted on
06/08/2005 7:09:42 PM PDT by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: rightfielder
24 posted on
06/08/2005 7:19:54 PM PDT by
DocRock
To: rightfielder; Zavien Doombringer; 4mycountry; Constitution Day; VRWCmember; Poohbah; dighton; ...
Retread?
This one sounds familiar...
31 posted on
06/08/2005 7:58:14 PM PDT by
mhking
(The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson