Why was only one man, Judge Greer, the determinant of the facts in Terri's case? In most other cases, it is a jury that determines the facts. Certainly the facts in all capital cases are determined by a jury. Subsequent appeals generally deal with interpretations of the law, rather than redetermining the facts of the case, unless there is new evidence.
Setting aside personalities, as distasteful as they appear to be, having only one person determine the facts seems to be the central failing of the judicial system in Terri's case. For the future, that failing could be solved by legislative action.
The American people ALWAYS act appropriately when they know the truth. It will be the job of those of us who know the truth to let others know. The only poll that is really worthwhile is election day.
Please count me in.
This is an excellent thread and a great credit to you. I can only offer you my heartfelt thanks for your work here. May the Lord prosper the work of your hands and heart in this.
When someone is glorified as a saint and martyr in the Orthodox Church, when is the term "Passionbearer" appropriate? Specifically, could you conceive of that being an appropriate title for someone like Terri in the event they were glorified?
Bump