Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: topher

Interesting article. Thanks.


2 posted on 03/23/2005 7:45:21 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hedgetrimmer

Interesting. It also leaves me breathless that the federal judge ignored the law Congress passed to do a de novo review, although I think judges can always decide whether or not to take a case. At this point I am hoping for a Roe v Wade decision from the Supremes that gets the government out of this entirely and rules that end of live decisions should be between a patient, his family, and his doc. No lawsuits.


4 posted on 03/23/2005 7:52:53 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: All
The problem is the fact that this isn't a "Constitutional" issue. This is a state/federal law issue. The government is stepping in and virtually changing judicial review. They are trying to get the federal court to intervene in a case that falls rightfully under the jurisdiction of state court. In my opinion, this is an abuse of power, no matter what I think of her fate.

Global News Matrix
10 posted on 03/23/2005 8:04:23 AM PST by MatrixMetaphore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson