To: hedgetrimmer
Interesting. It also leaves me breathless that the federal judge ignored the law Congress passed to do a de novo review, although I think judges can always decide whether or not to take a case. At this point I am hoping for a Roe v Wade decision from the Supremes that gets the government out of this entirely and rules that end of live decisions should be between a patient, his family, and his doc. No lawsuits.
4 posted on
03/23/2005 7:52:53 AM PST by
ClaireSolt
(.)
To: ClaireSolt
At this point I am hoping for a Roe v Wade decision from the Supremes that gets the government out of this entirely and rules that end of live decisions At the US Supreme Court, where the Roe v Wade decision is stored, they are always finding it turned upside down on the bookself [overturning Roe v Wade symbolically].
Associates of Supreme Court Justice are being blamed for this...
8 posted on
03/23/2005 7:58:38 AM PST by
topher
(Pray for our leaders -- Pray for Justice for Terri Schiavo -- let her live!)
To: ClaireSolt
At this point I am hoping for a Roe v Wade decision from the Supremes that gets the government out of this entirely Both the decision you ask for and Roe v Wade have brought bloodshed by decree. It was wrong then and would be wrong now. The first freedom is life.
27 posted on
03/23/2005 8:19:12 AM PST by
grassboots.org
(I'll Say It Again - The first freedom is life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson