"btw, while I understood the difference between the article (not vanity) that you posted and your comments that followed, you now can see the problem that indefinite articles (they, this, he, etc ...) can pose for many less attentive readers. carry on ..."
Indeed! It is a definite problem in brief commentary; specially with those ever ready to take offense on behalf of their "blog/home". Most of the comments I see in this thread are defenses of FR, and from those who mistakenly think I was attacking this site (FR).
Funny, but I think it was the initial, senseless posts of jpg's (pictures) in place of any reasoned commentary about what they thought I intended to mean by my post! Someone should tell these "guys" that they make themselves into idiots by doing so and are far worse than "indefinite articles". . .
Thanks for your reasoned comment.
Amazing, it's it? I doubt any of them actually read your post (#1).
Your title was taken as an attack and should have had a barf alert or something to guide at first glance..
You are indignant at being misunderstood..but look at what your post says in the title and climb off your high horse.
Try Democratic Underground,you'll fit right in!