Posted on 03/13/2005 8:05:03 PM PST by DaveDay
The two words "simply" and "wrong" do not seem to go together these days. The notion of "simply wrong" does not reflect the nuanced moral zeitgeist. Simplicity is not fashionable. "Wrong" is not fashionable. "Simply wrong" is antiquated, backwards, wrongheaded, and does not fit the modern moral sensibility. Why is it that a pop-star can dangle a child from a balcony with repercussion? After all, endangering the life of a child is "simply wrong" is it not? Why does a senator think he can compare his political rivals from the floor of the senate to the NAZIs? This is "simply wrong" is it not? How can the Connecticut legislature consider equating homosexuality to normal relationships? Homosexuality is "simply wrong" is it not?
"Not that there's anything wrong with that..." is a tag line from the Seinfeld show. It was used comically for those situations wherein the characters tried to distance themselves consciously from a judgment of right vs. wrong. The tag line implies that the characters would not engage in a particular set of behaviors themselves, may even be repulsed by the behaviors, but simultaneously wished to express the nouveau morality of the left. In nouveau morality acceptance and non-judgementalism trump traditional values. The irony of this position is that anyone who does not accept nouveau morality is labeled "immoral." Arbitrary morality therefore trumps the morality of the ages. For the left "simply wrong" is trumped by "not that there's anything wrong with that..." If there is nothing wrong, why say it?
Let's face it, homosexuality is simply wrong. It is corruption right to it's very marrow. Even its symbolism is corrupt...
(Excerpt) Read more at RadiofreeWestHartford.com ...
I am confident about my sexuality. Too bad, I can't say the same about you.
Okey, that's good.....glad to hear that! I expected to hear no different considering that "utopia" you live in.
I don't live in an utopia. You do. You think if we just stop preaching homosexuality in the schools, homosexuality will go away. Well, there were homosexuals long before there was sex ed.
Bye econ-grad, may you enjoy your extended stay in Neverland......
I agree 100% with your non-subsidizing POV. It's sick.
Promiscuity, either natural relations between men and women, or unnatural between two men (or two women), leads to all manner of diseases. But it is a fact that anal sex spread AIDS more than vaginal sex, although that is risky as well, obviously. But you know this.
Some residents of various African countries also practice other nasty stuff like "dry sex", screwing young boys on the side (or young girls or even babies), endemic adultery, and so on. All of that will help AIDS spread. It's all ethically and morally reprehensible.
That does that make you feel better?
What does this have to do with anything?
How about teaching in schools the fact that homosexuality can often be cured? That there are tens of thousands of former homosexuals? How about teaching the truth about homosexuality?
There have always been thieves, murderers, liars, and adulterers. Do we have tolerance and acceptance and diversity classes about those vices?
Homosexuality is a vice. It should not be promoted, tolerated, accepted, or celebrated. Those who have Same Sex Attraction should be offered the truth, and help. And not allowed around children, or to parade their vice in public.
Because you mentioned the incidence of AIDS in Africa. Do you read what you write?
I am saying AIDS will be a crisis with or without homosexuals. It is true that homosexuals lobby a lot for AIDS research, but so do others who see it as a crisis in Africa. I don't agree with their politics but their concern is real. If you think somehow you are immune from AIDS, then hopefully your partner(s) are aware of that.
AIDS is the easiest disease in the world not to get. I have zero, nada, zilch, no fear of AIDS whatsoever. I will never get AIDS unless I get in an accident with others and someone drips infected blood into my open wound.
In the US, there would be no AIDS crisis were it not for homosexuals and their insance sexual practices.
In the US, there would be no AIDS crisis were it not for homosexuals and their insance sexual practices.
Absolutely wrong! Talk to anyone who has worked in the field. In the US, there are plenty of drug users and people who frequent brothels. Not to mention hemophiliacs, etc.
What garbage. It was a homosexual who brought AIDS to hundreds of other homosexuals in the first place. Additionally, many intravenous drug users, male and female, prostitute themselves. Men prostituting themselves to guess who - homosexuals! Men who have sex with men (the current euphamism for homosexuals) sometimes have sex with women - more homosexual source for AIDS.
And the hemophiliacs who got AIDS got it because homosexuals with AIDS donated blood.
You are specious and a conscious liar. You never answered some of my questions which would have outed you as a shill for the "gay" agenda.
Your sense of logic is breathtaking. I hope you are careful in life. How do you in fact know that it was a homosexual who brought AIDS? Did he tell you? How do you know it was not a sailor who just jumped off the boat from Thailand or India or the African coast? Your prejudice is clouding your thoughts.
Homosexual males are responsible for 2/3 reported HIV/AISD cases in the U.S. even though they represent only 1-3% of the populace.
In the U.S AIDS is predominantly a homosexual disease. It was fist reported as "GAY CANCER" and was and still is rampant in the homosexual community.
Here do the math for your self, the numbers don't lie.
I am not disputing that in the US most AIDS cases are due to homosexuals and drug users. But, in places like Africa and India and Thailand, it is mostly heterosexual sex. The only thing you can say is that people who engage in risky sexual activities are susceptible to AIDS. You may say who cares about Africa or India, and that is fine. But, to say that AIDS is a gay disease, is factually and scientifically wrong.
I would agree -with one caveat that by default PROVES the obvious.
Most US AIDS cases are due to disordered male on male depraved 'barebacking' activity. Female homosexuals although just as disordered as male homosexuals are not infected in numbers anywhere close to the population of male homosexuals being ravaged by AIDS.
Anyone claiming something contrary to this is either misinformed or a homosexual activist...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.