Skip to comments.
Help Wil Wheaton Freep this poll!
WIL WHEATON dot NET ^
| March 07, 2005
| Wil Wheaton
Posted on 03/07/2005 9:52:47 PM PST by FreedomCalls
vote early, vote often
Oh dear. It appears that TV Guide is holding an online poll about Star Trek, and our dear, sweet young Ensign Crusher is currently leading in the "Most Annoying Character" category.
I know, it's hard to believe it, especially when we consider that Wesley was given lines such as, "We're from Starfleet! We don't lie!" and "I feel strange, but also good!" and the ever-popular "Course laid in, sir." But it's true. And so very, very sad.
Not that I care about this sort of thing . . . but actually, I do. I'm really tired of wearing that "Annoying Character" albatross around my neck, and if Wesley is voted most annoying in TV Guide's big old Farewell to Star Trek issue, I don't think I'll ever hear the end of it.
I'm not suggesting that thousands of WWdN readers go take the poll and stuff the ballot box. I mean, that would just be wrong, right?
Normally, I'd stuff this ballot box entirely on my own, but if some of you WWdN readers want to legitimately and honestly vote for another character, like The Computer Voice for instance I mean, come on! How many times did the stupid Ship's Computer actually save the crew? Yeah! That's what I thought. She's got nothing on Wesley Crusher I would be ever so grateful.
Provided, of course, that you truly believe there is a different, more annoying character than Wesley I'd never suggest taking actions which could call into question the legitimacy of an online Star Trek poll. Oh no, not me.
Never.
Perish the thought.
I'm serious! Start perishing (right after you vote, that is.)
Thank you.
TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: nextgeneration; startrek; wesleycrusher; wilwheaton
Wil is a good guy and his blog is worth reading on a daily basis. Will Wheaton is not Wesley Crusher as he could only say the lines they gave him. It's not his fault that the Star Trek writers
wrote him to be annoying. I think we can help him out here.
Link:
http://www.tvguide.com/tv/coverstory/050307trek.asp
To: FreedomCalls
Oh yes, Seven of Nine! And I thought Q was the most obnoxious. I picked Spock for an away mission, although Data was a pretty good choice. Nothing beats "Resistance is futile."
2
posted on
03/07/2005 9:58:35 PM PST
by
Enterprise
(President George W. Bush - the leading insurgent detergent.)
To: FreedomCalls
Hmm. High temptation to dink him for not visiting my geocache, but hey, what the heck. Besides, Warf's son was the most annoying character to ever grace the Star Trek universe.
3
posted on
03/07/2005 9:58:44 PM PST
by
kingu
(Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
To: FreedomCalls
To: FreedomCalls
To: FreedomCalls
If not him, then who?
Sheesh.
His character played opposite a very young Ashley Judd (the addictive visor game episode) and he didn't even show her any sweet lovin'.
Also, I saw him on celebrity poker and he's a serious steamer.
6
posted on
03/07/2005 10:01:59 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Zebras: Free Range Bar Codes of the Serengeti)
To: West Coast Conservative
Oh, no, I voted before I saw your post!
To: FreedomCalls
Lt.Barkley was no doubt the most vacuous character.
8
posted on
03/07/2005 10:03:48 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(This space is being paid not to do anything.)
To: West Coast Conservative
But he's still youthful. A lot of us were left of center when we were young. But once you pass 40, there's no more excuses. Even Bush himself has admitted to "youthful indiscretions."
9
posted on
03/07/2005 10:05:04 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Tired of Taxes
Best female romantic companion?
No question about it:
Uhura!
[yeah, baby]
10
posted on
03/07/2005 10:05:41 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Zebras: Free Range Bar Codes of the Serengeti)
To: Petronski
If not him, then who? Worf's son?
11
posted on
03/07/2005 10:07:27 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
Euh.
I only saw him as a kid on TNG. I didn't know.
12
posted on
03/07/2005 10:08:55 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Zebras: Free Range Bar Codes of the Serengeti)
To: FreedomCalls
Even Bush himself has admitted to "youthful indiscretions." Sure, I was brainwashed in college as well, but voted for Nixon.
I thought his character was OK in the beginning, but they totaled it later on with the altered state crap.
As for him being a liberal, all his friends are and his profession is.
They are arteee'sts, you know. Much more in touch with reality.
13
posted on
03/07/2005 10:11:49 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(This space is being paid not to do anything.)
To: Cold Heat
Sure, I was brainwashed in college as well, but voted for Nixon. I //blushing// voted for Carter.
Hey, I was a southerner, and I thought he would be conservative southern Democrat like Sam Ervin or Sam Nunn. Shows you how much I knew.....
14
posted on
03/07/2005 10:22:11 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
Yeah, A lot of people bought into the vision of a ex-navy sub officer, a southern gentleman and farmer.
The joke was not yet understood.
Carter's presidency was totally ineffectual. He surrounded himself with idiots from the campaign and DNC.
Kinda like Clinton did, but Clinton started cleaning house in less than two years. Carter let the justice department do it for him.:-)
15
posted on
03/07/2005 10:27:01 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(This space is being paid not to do anything.)
To: Cold Heat
The best warning about Carter's presidency was from someone who was there in the first 10 minutes. I don't remember who it was who wrote about it, but they said that at the first ever White House meeting in the Oval Office after his swearing in, everyone was sitting around chit-chatting, drinking coffee, and waiting for the meeting to start. The time set for the meeting came. Everyone continued to sit around. Then 5 minutes passed and everyone continued to sit around. Then 10 minutes, then 15 minutes. Everyone continued to sit around and make small talk. Then 20 minutes. Then 25, then 30, then 35. All the while no one did anything. I think it went on for close to an hour spilling over into the time reserved for the next meetings. No one wanted to step up and take responsibility to start the meeting. No one had an agenda. No one had a plan. No one knew what to do. They expected to be told what to do (like children). Carter himself had no clue. They eventually straightened it out, but it was a red flag on day one that these people were not ready to take on the responsibility for running the country.
16
posted on
03/07/2005 10:41:32 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
Does he act much anymore?
17
posted on
03/07/2005 11:12:16 PM PST
by
k2blader
(It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
To: k2blader
Does he act much anymore? He does a little local theater stuff and an occasional guest part in TV show. He worked on Star Trek X, but they cut all his scenes from the movie!
18
posted on
03/07/2005 11:38:05 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: West Coast Conservative
I am pretty sure that I'll wake up on November 3rd and tell my wife, "Our long national nightmare is over."He's not gay? Knock me over with a feather...
To: k2blader
He's going to be playing a demented homeless guy on CSI soon. He blogged about it a few weeks ago. (Still might vote for him though. I didn't really dislike Wesley Crusher, but Wil himself gets on my nerves.)
20
posted on
03/08/2005 7:57:34 AM PST
by
Starter
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson