Skip to comments.
Private Action for Philippine Statehood (Want to become 51st State)
The Expansionist Party ^
| Fall 2004
Posted on 03/07/2005 11:25:38 AM PST by The Loan Arranger
What We Propose. The Expansionist Party ("XP") advocates reannexation of the Philippines, a former U.S. colony, to the United States, but this time as up to three States of the Union: Luzon, Mindanao (the two largest islands, in the far north and south respectively) and the Visayas (the islands in between). We feel this is the only thing certain to secure both political and social democracy for the archipelago and set its people on the road to fairly distributed prosperity. We also believe the Philippines can help restore perspective and purpose to a U.S. that has lost sight of its original, revolutionary dedications: liberty and justice for all, not just for people within the present 50 states but for all people who need liberty and justice, everywhere in the world.
Philippine nationalism may seem a "nice" idea, but independence is a very hard road that leads to an uncertain destination. Recent events in the economy of East Asia have demonstrated that small countries have no economic security, no matter how rapid their short-term growth may be, because they are helpless before powerful forces of the world economy. What is the point of trying to be a new East Asian "Tiger" if even the older and more prosperous Tigers are utterly insecure economically?
The Philippines has been independent for over 53 years, if one counts only the period since the U.S. withdrew on July 4, 1946. Oddly, the Philippines has decided to ignore its years as a colony of the United States and count its independence from 1898. The Philippine Centennial Commission dates things this way:
(Excerpt) Read more at members.aol.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: colony; filipina; filipino; immigration; muslims; philippines; southeastasia; spanishamericanwar; statehood; territory; usa; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Hmmmm...what are your thoughts? Please, no racist posts, they are beneath us, leave those to the Democrats.
To: The Loan Arranger
The Muslim and Communist problems would have to be solved first.
2
posted on
03/07/2005 11:26:57 AM PST
by
Pyro7480
("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - Tolkien)
To: The Loan Arranger
Will they add to the tax base or be a drain on the treasury...?
3
posted on
03/07/2005 11:27:31 AM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: The Loan Arranger
Considering they seem pretty cozy to the Chi-coms and they kicked our military out, there is more chance of Antarctica becoming a US state than the Philipines.
To: The Loan Arranger
It would add 6 Dem senators.
5
posted on
03/07/2005 11:29:17 AM PST
by
So Cal Rocket
(Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
To: The Loan Arranger
English only countries.
If we have to go to 51 states, Why not lump some of these tiny left wing New England States to go together as one state?
6
posted on
03/07/2005 11:29:41 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(When you compromise with evil, evil wins. AYN RAND)
To: The Loan Arranger
Hmmmm...what are your thoughts?This is a good idea!! We don't have enough Americans sponging off the tax payer, let's bring in 86 million more!!!
7
posted on
03/07/2005 11:29:52 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
To: The Loan Arranger
Don't think they would be a 'Red' State.
To: The Loan Arranger
Hell no, the place is unstable and full of commies.
9
posted on
03/07/2005 11:30:24 AM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: The Loan Arranger
We feel this is the only thing certain to secure both political and social democracy for the archipelago and set its people on the road to fairly distributed prosperity.What do you mean by that?
10
posted on
03/07/2005 11:30:27 AM PST
by
shekkian
To: The Loan Arranger
As long as they take care of the terrorist groups that are there first.
11
posted on
03/07/2005 11:31:09 AM PST
by
areafiftyone
(The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
To: 2banana
Will they add to the tax base or be a drain on the treasury...?GDP - per capita:
purchasing power parity - $4,600
Drain, enormous, unbelievable drain.
12
posted on
03/07/2005 11:31:41 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
To: The Loan Arranger
Why would this even be proposed..
13
posted on
03/07/2005 11:32:00 AM PST
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Uh, most people in the Phillipines already speak English.
14
posted on
03/07/2005 11:32:11 AM PST
by
Pyro7480
("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - Tolkien)
To: The Loan Arranger
We also believe the Philippines can help restore perspective and purpose to a U.S. that has lost sight of its original, revolutionary dedications: liberty and justice for all, not just for people within the present 50 states but for all people who need liberty and justice, everywhere in the world. I went to Manila ten years ago, and I don't have much faith in their providing any useful "perspective and purpose to [the] U.S." Besides, 50 is a nice, even number.
And I'm against a world government, even if it's proposed to be the U.S. government.
15
posted on
03/07/2005 11:34:16 AM PST
by
FoxInSocks
(The Marines have landed, and the situation is well in hand.)
To: The Loan Arranger
My gut reaction is that it's not a good idea. It's too far away, too culturally different, and has too many interest that would conflict with the rest of the nation.
I suppose some people made that argument with Hawaii, but in Hawaii isn't nearly as far away, and hasn't had the same sort of deep-rooted cultural differences. Hawaii was isolated from the rest of the world, while the Philippines is smack dab in the middle of a different section of it.
To: Bikers4Bush
The real problem is that it would be too hard to fit on the quarter: "The United States of America and Southeast Asia." What then, If Liberia wants in? "The United States of America and Southeast Asia and East Africa."
This thing could get very complicated, very quickly.
17
posted on
03/07/2005 11:36:08 AM PST
by
D Rider
To: The Loan Arranger
It's certainly a mixed bag. One thing that concerns me is the fact that any terrorists in that country would suddenly become US citizens with all the rights and privileges.
18
posted on
03/07/2005 11:36:30 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
To: cripplecreek
There are many terrorists already that are US citizens (Jose Padillo, the American Talliban, the DC Snipers, .05% of Michigan, etc). Imagine having 86 million more people paying into FICA!
19
posted on
03/07/2005 11:48:57 AM PST
by
The Loan Arranger
(http://www.millenniummortgagemississippi.lenderhost.com)
To: The Loan Arranger
Imagine having 86 million more people paying into FICA! Right, when your Ponzi scheme is running low, just add more suckers!!
20
posted on
03/07/2005 11:56:05 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson