Posted on 03/01/2005 6:33:52 PM PST by thebiggestdog
As I was freezing my butt off in the frigid midwest, I was thinking about Ronald Reagan and his famous 'tear down this wall' speech. That, my friends was compassionate conservatism. Unfortunately, we may not see another conservative like RR for a long time. The ideals that Reagan had were simple-the individual can do a better job of managing his or her own life than the government can. Ronnie saw government as being too intrusive on peoples lives, and that if you give something away for free that could be earned, you are doing that person no favor.
I was talking with a woman who lives in San Francisco last night over a few cocktails, and she is no longer happy in the city by the bay. San Fran has become the Ritz Carlton for 'homeless' people, and the last survey done estimates there are about 10,000 in the city. The county of San Francisco, in an attempt to be compassionate to these people, pays them around $400 dollars a month. Where does that money go? Not for food, shelter and basic necessities, but for alcohol, drugs or simply down the drain. The folks who run SF and certainly not conservatives, but many conservatives are moving towards liberalville.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotchicken.com ...
The whole "compassionate conservative" slogan was an insulting one all along, as it played into and gave credence to the lies told about conservatives by the Left.
I can understand the rationale behind it from a political perspective, but the way Bush said it always sounded to me like he was implicitly saying that conservatives who preceded him were not compassionate.
ditto. v's wife.
I remember Bush saying that politicians who are opposed to illegal immigrants somehow want to keep Mexicans poor. I am in favor of migrant workers, but I don't think people who are opposed to my viewpoint somehow are prejudiced against Mexicans.
I wish President Bush held a similar open-minded approach to dissent on this issue as you do. His rhetoric on immigration is practically indistinguishable from that of the Left and ethnic interest groups.
it was intended to, and was successful in, blunting the bigoted and confused democratic attacks on the GOP as being willing to starve children, fire everyone that made under $200K per year, and toss your granny out on the street in winter.
as a campaign tactic in 2000, it worked wonderfully. he won, right?
And the compassionate conservative message gave credence to such view of the right. The point was Bush isn't that kind of a conservative, he is compassionate. BTW, I could care less about the Republican label. I am more concerned about the conservative label.
If "compassionate conservatism" aka taxpayer-funded-welfare-is-the-Christian-thing-to-do ideology is dead, GREAT!!
Unfortunately, I doubt it's true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.