Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Sir, thats assault" (video of Colorado reporter questioning Churchill about fake art from Fox)
Jackson's Junction ^ | 2-25-2005 | TJackson

Posted on 02/25/2005 9:07:08 PM PST by TJackson

This is the video of the Colorado newsman trying to question Ward Churchill about the fake art today.

(Excerpt) Read more at treyjackson.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Local News; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: art; wardchurchill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2005 9:07:09 PM PST by TJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TJackson

I just saw this video on the 11 PM rerun of O'Reilly. I'd read that this guy was really nasty and his colors sure came through in this incident. Predictions are that he will be canned in the coming week...not soon enough, IMO.


2 posted on 02/25/2005 9:17:57 PM PST by PistolPaknMama (Will work for cool tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama
Predictions are that he will be canned in the coming week...not soon enough, IMO.

I wish they would cane him too.

3 posted on 02/25/2005 9:24:52 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TJackson
-WATCH NOW-

4 posted on 02/25/2005 9:59:57 PM PST by WSGilcrest (Tinky likes it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TJackson

Phoney Injun BUMP


5 posted on 02/25/2005 10:05:55 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest

The entire video piece is here:

http://news4colorado.com/topstories/local_story_055200531.html

Scroll down to where it says CBS video: Churchill's aggressive reaction ....


6 posted on 02/25/2005 10:25:02 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TJackson

I can't play video at work. Can anyone give a summary?


7 posted on 02/25/2005 11:44:46 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (Liberalism: The irrational fear of self reliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TJackson

bttt


8 posted on 02/25/2005 11:45:43 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

My speakers aren't working, but click on the link because there's a transcript in the article. I then watched the video (without sound), which you can do at work, and it's very short, but actually the guy was pretty violent, IMO, at least that's how it came off (without sound). Looks like Churchill's almost over the edge. Now, if the media just keeps up the pressure, it'll be over soon.

I haven't really followed this whole Churchill thing very closely, but from the looks of him, he's really lost in the 70's with that long hair, and his unkempt appearance--the man's got personal problems, that's for sure. Wonder if he's got a drug problem? He seems to have an affinity for the druggie look anyway.


9 posted on 02/26/2005 12:13:05 AM PST by Auntie Mame ("Whether you think you can or think you can't -- you are right." Henry Ford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame

The link I referenced was in post #6. It was worth a click.


10 posted on 02/26/2005 12:14:11 AM PST by Auntie Mame ("Whether you think you can or think you can't -- you are right." Henry Ford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Can anyone give a summary?

Reporter asking question...Churchill covers camera with newspaper... Churchill removes paper long enough to give the reporter a fairly good punch in the solar plexus...reporter: "Sir, that's assault" then continues...Churchill grumbles and escapes into office.

11 posted on 02/26/2005 12:24:30 AM PST by ohCompGk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ohCompGk

Thanks.


12 posted on 02/26/2005 12:27:12 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (Liberalism: The irrational fear of self reliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ohCompGk

That IS assault! File charges, and get his butt hauled off to jail.

I'd like to see Churchhill in cuffs.


13 posted on 02/26/2005 12:32:04 AM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

The newspaper Churchill hits them with has the headline "Churchill Not Native."

LoL!


14 posted on 02/26/2005 12:39:00 AM PST by sarah_f ( Know Islam, Know Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TJackson

How much is needed before the trigger is pulled on Ward Churchill? The man is the worst type of scoundrel.


15 posted on 02/26/2005 12:52:54 AM PST by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohCompGk

The video continues on, Churchill locks himself in his office as the reporter asks Churchill about his forgeries. Obviously Churchill gets on the phone with his lawyer, becasue he soon comes out smiling, spinning some BS about how he had permission to copy the other painting. WC said it was not his fault any buyers of his painting were not aware his work copied other work.


16 posted on 02/26/2005 4:47:37 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

This is totally amazing!! The son of the original painter artist who is now gone, said his father would NEVER would have given permission for his work to be used and copied, that he religiously protected his work ( as he should have)!! I believe this slim Churchill is in deep do do!! I hope they nail him to the nearest yardarm!!


17 posted on 02/26/2005 7:50:10 AM PST by cousair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TJackson

I have been researching the two Boulder AIM activists Professor Ward Churchill and attorney Lee
Hill for several years.

I have an enormous amount of research, but what I have found is so scary that I thought maybe I was crazy. So since 2003, I gave up my research. Now it is all coming out about how Ward Hill is a plagiarist. He is much worse.

I am going to sketch it out. I have all
the details. This is a very complicated propaganda drive so I am only sketching the big picture. But make no mistake, I have all the details to back up my accusation.

Lee Hill was the lawyer for Leonard Peltier, the Indian who was convicted of murdering two FBI agents. Hill lived in Boulder until he jumped bail and ran on assault, weapons, and driving charges. Lee Hill, the man who organized a lot of lies about the Ramsey case and fed them to the media, is on the run from the law.

The AIM activists Ward Churchill and Lee Hill are really anarchists, and their main agenda is to discredit law enforcement, especially the FBI. They are not really about helping Indians. They make life more difficult for
Indians.

After JonBenet Ramsey was murdered, AIM activist and lawyer Lee Hill orchestrated fake witnesses and interfered with the Ramsey grand jury. His purpose was not to uncover the killer but to promote the false perception in the media that the government, police and FBI were covering up
for a ring of highly-placed pedophiles. The real agenda was anarchistic: to discredit government institutions.

This propaganda was much like what Ward Churchill and AIM had done at PineRidge Indian Reservation. They had claimed that the FBI was protecting the killers of about 50 Indian AIM activists and their families who were supposedly murdered. Churchill called this episode the "Reign of Terror."

At Pine Ridge and Boulder, AIM activists have claimed that the FBI protected killers. Ward Churchill has written that the FBI are terrorists.

I noticed that the story Churchill told about the suspicious deaths at Pine Ridge during the "Reign of Terror" is plagiarized from an FBI file called
The Osage Indian Murders.

To create his propaganda about Pine Ridge,
Churchill cannabalized the Osage Murders FBI file and reworked it into his Pine Ridge myth. KJust as Churchill made a "mirror image" of the paintings, he made a "mirror image of an FBI file.

Churchill hates the FBI so he plagiarized their first big case and then made the FBI the "bad guys" in his Pine Ridge propaganda. This is the classic BIG LIE. It is so big I felt crazy when I figured it out, but this is Churchill's tin foil hat, not mine. Now that people see he plagiarized the painting, people may believe me about how Churchill plagiarized the FBI file on the Osage Indian murders.

There is also a book by Lawrence Hogan called the Osage Indian Murders. The book is easier to read than the FBI files, tho' these are on line at
http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/osageind.htm Hogan was an FBI agent and a US Congressman.

This FBI investigation was the first big case of the FBI. Perhaps that is why this file is the focus of Churchill's hatred and the subtext of his delusional system.

In the 1920s, many rich Osage Indians were murdered on the orders of a wealthy rancher named Hale so that his family could control oil-head rights through a young Indian woman who was married to a nephew of Hale's.

These murders were made to look like accidents in many cases; the Indians called this era the "Reign of Terror."

Churchill plagiarized his myth of the Pine Ridge "Reign of Terror" from the Osage story. He even used the same term "Reign of Terror." He wrote that there were suspicious deaths of AIM activists being facilitated by the FBI.

He called the FBI terrorists in his writings about Pine Ridge. I will not address the FBI refutations of Churchill's myth now, because this is just
the overview. You can read refutations at http://www.noparolepeltier.com

The Osage contacted the new FBI, and the Bureau investigated the killings. They went undercover because the Indians were afraid to talk to an FBI agent. This is a problem even now. The Indians are told by AIM not to trust
the FBI; so they don't help the FBI solve crimes and are victimized by criminals. The FBI can't help us if we citizens don't help them. They depend on citizens coming forward.

Now here is the thing that blew me away in the Osage Indian Murders FBI file. The actual hired killer of the Osage was named John Ramsey. Thei s the name of the father of the murdered Boulder child JonBenet Ramsey.

I think that some AIM person/s killed JonBenet and chose this family because the father's name was symbolic in their anti-FBI delusional system. If you compare Churchill's propaganda to the ransom note it is all the same themes. I think some AIM radical write this ransom note.

The JonBenet ransom note is from "a small foreign faction." Colorado AIM is called a faction because they are split from the Minneapolis branch.

The ransom note is extremely long and brutal. The author likes writing down his vicious beliefs so he can hurt John Ramsey. The writer says he is smarter than the police and FBI. The author is against America.

The author, a person who kills little children in the cellar, even uses the "scholarly" conjunctive adverb "hence." Ward Churchill uses the word "hence"
a lot.

The author of the ransom note uses parallel structures to hammer home his most brutal points and so does Churchill:

Ransom note: "she dies...she dies...she dies...she dies"

Churchill's Roosting Chickens: "when you push people around, some people push back." As they should. As they must. And as they undoubtedly will. There is justice in such symmetry."

The ransom note is signed "Victory! S.B.T.C. The Internet company for Mount Rushmore is http://www.sbtc.net AIM bombed Mount Rushmore Visitor Center in the 1970s. The monument at Mount Rushmore is a red flag for AIM. Like the
name John Ramsey, Mount Rushmore Monument is very symbolic for AIM as a focus of their hatred.

Here are some links to two of Churchill's writings and to the ransom note:

http://orlandodirectaction.us/churchill.html (Churchill on Roosting Chickens)

http://www.noparolepeltier.com/churchill.html
(Churchill dueling with FBI about Pine Ridge)

http://www.statementanalysis.com/ramseynote/ (Ransom note)

I knew all this for a few years but nobody would listen, and I was reluctant to look like some nut who was solving the Ramsey murder on the Internet. I put my research away, but now that Ward Churchill is in the news and is
shown to be a plagiarist who is so cruel and vicious, I need to speak up.

I have all kinds of documentation about how AIM activists influenced and manipulated websites, newspapers and radio to advance their anti-government and anti FBI agenda after JonBenet Ramsey was murdered.

I am not the least bit crazy. I have a degree in Soviet Studies and know how to research propaganda and disinformation operations.

This is very complicated so I only gave you the bare bones. I don't expect you to just buy into this instantly. It took me years.

Here are some links to posts I have posted on Free Republic.

This is all a really complicated propaganda attack on the government. In my opinion, the poor little girl's death was just to start the ball rolling on the lie that the government was covering up a powerful ring of pedophiles.

You can pull this thread if you are afraid of Ward Churchill and Lee Hill coming after you. Maybe they will.
Communists often use slander and libel laws to silence their enemies. In the former USSR, this law was called "anti soviet agitation and propaganda." It means telling the truth about what the communists are doing.

Ward Churchill is the real slanderer. He has denounced the US government, the FBI and CIA as terrorists and and the Americans murdered as Eichmans. He slanders all of us. I have lots of evidence that suggests that AIM activists were involved in the terrorist murder of the little JonBenet Ramsey.

Here are some links where I explain this, but I have more.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1335495/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1336690/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1340840/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1347385/posts?page=4


18 posted on 02/26/2005 8:09:12 AM PST by Snapple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarah_f

Haha, I was trying to read that too


19 posted on 02/26/2005 12:44:20 PM PST by Nate1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Snapple

so what does sbtc stand for on the website?


20 posted on 02/26/2005 1:09:04 PM PST by Nate1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson