Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rocksblues

Green Bay police counter these objections by pointing out that anyone pulled over has the right to refuse being fingerprinted

Seems only those with a dirty background have anything to fear.

Plus, how world it look if a terrorist was stopped and let go because he lied about his real ID?

Screww em all, if you're dirty, go to jail and and don't pass go.


3 posted on 02/11/2005 2:38:03 PM PST by damncat (No matter how much the cats fight, there always seem to be plenty of kittens. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: damncat

Yeah right... screw the Bill of Rights!!!!


4 posted on 02/11/2005 2:52:26 PM PST by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat

So you support this ridiculous gross misuse of biometrics? You trust the Green Bay pigs to be honest with this information? Do you think that this fingerprinting may have other more subtle uses, and these uses would be given the green light as soon as all the hubbub has died down? I'm curious.


5 posted on 02/11/2005 2:53:07 PM PST by natewill (Start the revolution NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat

And of course the Green Bay Police, being on the front lines of the War on Terror, will also be taking DNA samples to insure that everyone they stop isn't perhaps a distant relation to any of the 19 9/11 hijackers, and to reassure the public of their dedication to the Bill of Rights, a freshly printed and laminated copy of the Constitution will be rolled into a fine tube and rammed up the azz of every person detained in a traffic stop.

Hey, I'm all for fighting terrorism and bad guys, but this is bullshirt.


7 posted on 02/11/2005 3:11:18 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat

Why not just shoot the speeders on sight. After all they are criminals.


9 posted on 02/11/2005 3:19:43 PM PST by TheFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat
Next you will be saying that refusal to be fingerprinted or not consenting to a police search creates probable cause in the officers eyes thus giving him the green light for your "detention" while the dogs show up to tear your private belongings all over the countryside?

Some light reading for you.

Here is an excerpt

4th Amendment The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

10 posted on 02/11/2005 3:46:38 PM PST by Delta 21 (MKC USCG -ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat
Seems only those with a dirty background have anything to fear.

And the rest of us? Those who object to police-state tactics?

12 posted on 02/11/2005 4:02:55 PM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat
"Green Bay police counter these objections by pointing out that anyone pulled over has the right to refuse being fingerprinted Seems only those with a dirty background have anything to fear. Plus, how world it look if a terrorist was stopped and let go because he lied about his real ID? Screww em all, if you're dirty, go to jail and and don't pass go."

Considering what can be gleaned from a legitimate Driver's License number, one should refuse.

26 posted on 02/11/2005 4:22:55 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat

"Seems only those with a dirty background have anything to fear. "

That's the kind of thinking any authoritarian state encourages in it's subjects.


32 posted on 02/11/2005 4:42:51 PM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat
Seems only those with a dirty background have anything to fear.

Is that a serious remark you've made?

Surely not.

If it was intended to be serious, may I remind you of the provisions of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution?

I invite you to read it, I won't post it here, just google US Constitution and find the Fourth Amendment thereto.

I fought several stinking little wars for this damned government, ostensibly in defense of that document.

I had several friends that gave their life for it.

Hell no, I will never willingly submit to this kind of police-state bullshit and anyone that does is not worthy of my support.

So can I assume that you just forgot the sarcasm tag?

48 posted on 02/11/2005 7:39:40 PM PST by OldSmaj (Jihad this, Islam! Your religion is false and your god is non-existent! Come get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat
Screww em all, if you're dirty, go to jail and and don't pass go.

But that's just it; I'm not dirty, I've never had my prints taken either. Why should I have to have the assumption of guilt thrust upon me because I have a tail light out? To make YOU feel better?

Sorry, but screw you.

I know about databases and this is just a way to populate databases with out all the hubub.

Boiling frogs dontchaknow.

Wake up and smell the $#!t.

49 posted on 02/11/2005 7:47:03 PM PST by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: damncat

"Seems only those with a dirty background have anything to fear. "

Or those who object on principle to being treated like a criminal.

A traffic infraction is not a crime, and people stopped for traffic infractions should not be treated like criminals.


73 posted on 02/15/2005 10:39:20 AM PST by Altamira (Get the UN out of the US, and the US out of the UN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson