Skip to comments.
CALI WOMAN FIGHTING FOR TOPLESS SUNBATHING
Crosswalk ^
| 1.22.2005
Posted on 01/22/2005 5:16:40 PM PST by KMC1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 last
To: 26lemoncharlie
Hope you didn't take offense...I was just trying to joke about your poor syntax. As a former editor, things like missing commas jump out at me and conjure up some funny images. Sorry if you took offense.
Is your first language German? I noted that you capitalized nouns.
101
posted on
01/23/2005 6:26:46 AM PST
by
Gondring
(They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
To: Malsua
When I lived in Europe I saw a lot of nudity, after a while it was no big deal. I started changing into my swimsuit by the poolside like everybody else. I wish the US would mature in this area.
102
posted on
01/23/2005 6:31:50 AM PST
by
gortklattu
(As the preacher in Blazing Saddles said "You're on your own.")
To: KMC1
103
posted on
01/23/2005 7:16:56 AM PST
by
Gondring
(They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
To: eno_
Since your comments are missing any clarity in this regard, what exactly do you believe?
Are you saying the scriptures written prior to Jesus coming into the world are invalidated?
Do you believe in Jesus? Do you know what He taught? Do you know what his apostles taught?
"God thinks the naked human form is inappropriate. "
Inappropriate for what? Are you saying God wants everyone to run around naked all of the time?
And what do bacon cheeseburgers have to do with this?
To: cyborg
and you just might be right
To: unlearner
Are you saying the scriptures written prior to Jesus coming into the world are invalidated? Why don't you tell me WHICH are invalidated: Paul solved a marketing problem for Christianty by tossing circumcision overboard. But the temporal leaders of churches have a good deal less standing to pick and choose whether nakedness or pork are more sinful.
106
posted on
01/23/2005 9:37:00 AM PST
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: Gondring
No I was not a very good typist !!! No offense taken here, I enjoyed you post! I'll try to be more careful with the CAPS!!
107
posted on
01/23/2005 10:11:01 AM PST
by
26lemoncharlie
(Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
To: eno_
The Law was written to Jews and other people who lived in the nation of Israel.
Circumcision was not thrown overboard. The apostles simply recognized that becoming a believer in Jesus did not require becoming a Jew. Earlier, the followers of Jesus were all essentially Jewish.
Paul did not command Jews to abandon their Jewishness. In fact, I think he circumcised one Jewish convert who had not been circumcised before. (I do not have time to look this up at the moment, so I am going on memory.)
" whether nakedness or pork are more sinful."
This shows you fail to comprehend the basics of interpreting scripture. Neither nakedness nor pork are called sinful. Jesus was naked on the cross. Was He sinful?
Nakedness is a shame. The problem is that nakedness-promoters like you take pride in their shame. This is symptomatic of deeper spiritual problems.
God called His creation "good" including pigs. Does that mean pigs are good for eating? They are not the best thing to eat. Jews are commanded to abstain from certain foods as part of their piety. God gives them special blessings for their obedience.
But these are just red herrings to take your sin out of the spotlight.
The real issue is "What will you do with this man, Jesus, who is called the 'Christ'?"
We do not inherit the kingdom of God by wearing the right things or eating the right foods. God has commanded all men, everywhere to REPENT and BELIEVE the gospel. This message is that Jesus died, was buried and rose from the dead the third day. "Jesus" is the only name give to men by which we can be saved.
To: JudyinCanada
At least ten years ago a girl in Kitchener or Waterloo decided to parade topless down the streets because it was ok for men to do the same. It went to court and needless to say, being Canada and all, it is actually legal for woman to walk around topless in Ontario.Ten to one it wasn't in January.
109
posted on
01/23/2005 10:28:18 AM PST
by
reg45
To: reg45
If it was, she could be arrested for maintaining an attractive nuisance: YOU COULD PUT SOMEONE'S EYE OUT!
110
posted on
01/23/2005 10:46:10 AM PST
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: reg45
LOL! No, lovely summer day. That was her point...men could be comfortable in the heat with no shirt and she wanted the same "right".
111
posted on
01/23/2005 11:03:35 AM PST
by
JudyinCanada
(Five-fingered Canadian)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson