Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rommy
Education should not be a for-profit enterprise.

Oooooh, Can't have any evil profits be made.

So what would your incentive be for someone to build and staff a school?

ML/NJ

25 posted on 01/13/2005 2:42:20 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj

There is no incentive for private concerns to build and staff a school beyond a)religion-based education (i.e. Catholic school) b) profit or c) creating an institution by which the priviledged will ensure that their children recieve an education which will gurantee them entrance to one of the nation's top colleges (i.e. exclusive east-coast private schools)

None of these are good models for mass education.

Religious organizations cannot be responsible for mass education for the reason that not every student would subscribe to the religion that is promoted at the school, therefore their civil rights would be violated if they were forced to attend such a school. (For instance, can you imagine how Catholic parents would feel if their children were forced to go to a school which actively promoted the Southern Baptist Convention or Mormonism?)

For profit organizations are in the business of maximizing their shareholder value, not providing a quality education for the masses. Their educational philosophy would inevitably be driven by a profit-loss mentality that preclude them from taking the student's needs into account first. (i.e. Instead of providing nutritious, USDA recommended foods, we will outsource our cafeteria to Pizza Hut. I recognize that this is occurring today in public schools, I'm simply saying that it would undoubtedly be even more prevelant in for-profit private schools which existed on a mass scale.)

And the third model cannot be used for obvious reasons. (Not every parent can afford the twenty thousand dollar plus tuitions that those schools charge.)

Public schools may not be a great solution, but they are the best one we have for delivering education to the masses.

Rather then abandon public education, we need to radically reform it and make it less top-heavy, more responsive and more responsible. We need more classrooms, more teachers, fewer bureaucrats and more money for quality textbooks and supplies. Furthermore, we need to attract a better quality of teacher to the field of public education. (A good model for doing this is for the government to forgive a large amount of student loans for those who recieve high marks in college and are willing to sign multi-year contracts with a public school.)


27 posted on 01/13/2005 3:13:37 PM PST by rommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj

Incidently, someone on one of these threads had an excellent idea the other day about how to reform bureaucracies that exist within. public schools. He proposed that we limit the size of school districts in order to prevent bureaucrats from consolidating their power within school districts.

I thought it was a fantastic idea, enough so that I've been discussing it with several friends of mine since then.


28 posted on 01/13/2005 3:22:29 PM PST by rommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson