Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoRighty
It depends on what you're disagreeing about, and how you do it. For instance, I would say it is safe to say that the recount, or lawsuits, will never get JK in office as President, and that Democrats should spend their time on the next election. It would be risky, I think, to protest too strongly that GWB REALLY won.

You have to remember, the point is neither to blast them as they deserve, nor to try to win the argument. That would be impossible. The whole point, the only point that I can see, is to plant jsut that tiny seed that might actually bloom into a genuine thought on the part on one or two of them. Oh, and to make fools of them.
134 posted on 12/25/2004 1:30:42 PM PST by chesley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: chesley; epow
Thanks for this. And thanks to all for tolerating my edification on this DUFU thread (we could've gone offline). When I hit 1000 posts over there (Or get booted), I weigh in on the topic, again.

Here's to anonymity and tweaking DUmmies.
141 posted on 12/25/2004 2:09:44 PM PST by ChicagoRighty (Surrounded by libbies and damn tired of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson