Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HIDDEN SECRETS OF THE U.N. (Worse than we thought!)
Private Email | DECEMBER 21, 2004 | CLIFF KINCAID

Posted on 12/21/2004 7:11:02 PM PST by CHARLITE

Lee Feinstein of the Council on Foreign Relations was on MSNBC assuring the public that U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan has a good record of supporting the U.S. Feinstein, a former Clinton administration official, said the only exceptions have been a few comments critical of U.S. policy in Iraq. But he indicated that now that the White House has endorsed Annan and he has announced that he wants to send U.N. personnel back into Iraq to help with the elections, the U.S.-U.N. relationship is back on track.

In fact, however, Annan’s anti-American record is a long one. ....

Made a deal with dictator Saddam Hussein, respecting Iraq’s “sovereignty” and leading to the expulsion of weapons inspectors and Iraq's re-emergence as an international security threat.

Made a deal with Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi, giving him immunity from prosecution in the Pan Am 103 terrorism case.

Supports the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, which was voted down by the U.S. Senate.

Supports the global warming treaty, which would raise U.S. energy prices while benefiting Communist China and the Third World.

Supports an International Criminal Court with the power to arrest and imprison Americans.

Supports the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, even though it was signed with a country that no longer exists and was violated by the old Soviet Union and Russia.

Supports the Biological Weapons Convention, even though China and Russia have violated it.

Opposes a national missile defense system for the U.S.

Collaborated with Hillary Clinton to promote abortion as an “international right.”

Smeared the U.S. as a greedy nation in a Notre Dame speech claiming Americans don’t spend enough on foreign aid.

Supports all “necessary revenues” for the U.N. (i.e. global taxes).

Lent his support to the international campaign to abolish the death penalty in the U.S. and other nations.

Berated the U.S. for not paying U.S. “dues” to the U.N. when America had contributed billions of dollars to peacekeeping operations that had not been reimbursed or credited to the U.S.

Promotes “global debt relief,” a cover for transfers of more U.S. wealth to deadbeat Socialist Third World dictatorships.

As director of U.N. peacekeeping, refused requests to authorize U.N. peacekeepers in Rwanda to seize weapons and prevent genocide.

Proceeded with a U.N.-sponsored independence vote in East Timor that led to a bloodbath.

Covered up the fact that U.N. soldiers were spreading AIDS around the world.

In anticipation of Annan’s visit to Washington, D.C., Nora Boustany of the Washington Post wrote an article favorably highlighting a new Annan-commissioned report on how to make the world body more effective. This really means expanding the power of the U.N. while restricting the U.S. under the cover of “reform.”

Boustany conveniently omitted the fact that Yevgeny Primakov represented Russia on the Annan panel that produced the report. Primakov, the former Russian foreign minister, was always known for his close ties to Saddam Hussein and was alleged by Seymour Hersh in the April 5, 1999, issue of the New Yorker magazine to have accepted an $800,000 payment from the Iraqi government.

Scott Ritter, the former U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq who turned into a critic of U.S. policy toward the Saddam Hussein regime, claims that Primakov’s sister ran a Russian oil company that bought oil from Iraq under the oil-for-food program and sold it at full market value primarily to U.S. companies. Ritter claims the Clinton administration turned a “blind eye” to the deal because then-U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright wanted Russian help in dealing with the Iraqi regime.

Ritter has lost credibility, stemming from his flip-flop on Iraq policy and personal moral scandals. But his charges about corruption in the growing oil-for-food scandal cannot be dismissed out of hand. It was under Albright as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. that Linda Shenwick, the budget analyst at the U.S. Mission, was harassed and eventually fired because she was raising alarms about waste, fraud and abuse in U.N. programs. The public interest law firm Judicial Watch defended Shenwick, who had to sue the State Department for damages for persecuting her. Curiously, the Colin Powell State Department hired Clinton lawyer Gregory Craig to defend itself against Shenwick. There was a settlement, but Shenwick was not allowed to return to the U.S. Mission.

Did Albright suspect that Shenwick would uncover the oil-for-food scandal or the deals with Primakov? What U.S. companies were involved? The U.N’s belated help in Iraq should not preclude answers. The media should demand them.

© 2004 Cliff Kincaid - All Rights Reserved

Cliff Kincaid, a veteran journalist and media critic, Cliff concentrated in journalism and communications at the University of Toledo, where he graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree.

Cliff has written or co-authored nine books on media and cultural affairs and foreign policy issues.

Cliff has appeared on Hannity & Colmes, The O’Reilly Factor, Crossfire and has been published in the Washington Post, Washington Times, Chronicles, Human Events and Insight.
Web Site: www.AIM.org
E-Mail: kincaid@comcast.net


TOPICS: Government; History; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; aids; albright; clinton; colinpowell; deals; gadhafi; hillaryclinton; intlright; iraq; kofiannan; leefeinstein; libya; lindashenwick; moammar; noraboustany; oilforfood; primakov; russia; rwanda; scandal; scottritter; un; unsoldiers; washingtonpost; whistleblower

1 posted on 12/21/2004 7:11:04 PM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

When will this government of ours throw these maggots out of the USA??? Long overdue.


2 posted on 12/21/2004 7:44:34 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
The UN does not serve the interests of America and stands in the way of our objective to spread freedom. We pay 22% of the UN's budget for the privilege of being opposed by dictators that are treated as our equals. The United States, and eventually the world, would be better off without this corrupt organization. It's time to pull the plug.
3 posted on 12/21/2004 8:59:42 PM PST by Jaysun (DEMOCRATS: "We need to be more effective at fooling people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson