Berkeley bunkum

The American Thinker ^ | Nov. 22, 2004 | Richard Baehr

[Kitten Festival]

For the past few days, the die-hard internet conspiracy theorists, desperate to cling to some thread of reasoning that will reassure them that Kerry actually won - that Bush stole the 2004 election - have been touting a “study” released by some sociology students at the University of California at Berkeley. The paper, titled The Effect of Electronic Voting Machines on Change in Support for Bush in the 2004 Florida Election, suggests that Bush received a surprisingly large number of votes in three heavily-Democratic counties in Southeast Florida that used electronic voting machines in this election. The implication is that something nefarious took place there, and that Bush’s vote totals in these three counties were not legitimate.

[Kitten Festival]

Leftist claims that the election was a fraud is blown apart in this knowledgeable essay. The writer knows more about this than these Berkeley clowns do.

[wvobiwan]

Yeah, a leftist can hear the tree falling in the forest - even when it's a used car lot.

[AVNevis]

I guess New Hampshire should have gone Bush this time because you know people vote the same every four years. I demand a recount! Sarcasm off.

[passeryby]

More analysis debunking the Berkeley study can be found here: Berkeley Florida Election Study Falling Apart?

[Kitten Festival]

Excellent - thanks!

[passeryby]

You're welcome! :-)