Posted on 11/18/2004 6:54:25 AM PST by ubu
Maybe they should investigat Hollywood and their willingness to continue to employee pedophiles and there willingness to promote them on the big screen.
Gee, I wish I could remember the screen names of some of the Houston area FReepers...
If I knew any of them, I'd ping them. I've not been on here that long and haven't really made any contacts. :-(
I lurked for a year before joining, and have tried very hard to remember who is who and where they're from, if I can.
I know the three or four people in pinged in #3 will know who to ping.
FR is a treasure trove of information...you'll learn more here in a year watching the back and forth discussion of ideas than you could learn in four years at an Ivy League college!
TV station accuses military of protecting pedophilesExcerpt:Link/graphic to video advertising the segment is at the top of the right-most column. For those who don't know or remember, Channel 11
is owned by the Belo Broadcasting Group, and is where Dan Rather got his start in the 60's. I wrote them a rather sharp email after the joke that was Rathergate, but the final response I got might as well have been written by a machine.
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Texas ping list!. . .don't be shy.
No, you don't HAVE to be a Texan to get on this list!
There should be plenty of Houston area Freepers in that ping, I hope.Maybe Flyer or Gracie will ping their list as well.
Here you go girl. See if you can ping your Houston FReepers.
This one found it.
Bringing a couple of others along. They can spread it.
Well, shouldn't we see if the military actually IS re-enlisting pedophiles before we get our panties in a bunch?
Ping, but with reservations. I'd like to see some back-up on what the story actually SAYS before I start to run in circles and scream and shout.
I have heard two versions of the blurb now. One said "accused pedophiles" so we're in the "guilty in the press before innocent under the law" mode again. The other was the original from this morning, which definately indicated that the military was doing this due to a desperate shortage of people. That offends me far more than anything else; the guy(s) can be guilty as sin and I'm still going to be angry over the press using it to claim the military is desperate for soldiers.
I pulled up the film clip on their website, which turned out to be the same as I heard over the radio. Here are the exact words:
(Announcer): "Just how bad does the United States Military need soldiers? Bad enough to keep pedophiles in uniform."
(Woman's voice): "When somebody told me that he had re-enlisted, I hit the roof."
(Announcer): "A stunning discovery, tonight, on 11News at 10."
The most likely reasons for anyone to still be in uniform are:
1. The process to discharge them hasn't been completed.
2. They are only accused, not yet tried.
3. Bureaucratic foul-up.
The implication -- hell it's not an implication, they're outright SAYING that the military would deliberately choose to keep pedophiles in uniform due to shortage of soldiers, and I find that outrageous.
Remember -- Channel 11 is a "CBS" station. We already know how "accurate" their news coverage is.
Don't forget jumping up and down. :)
I watch the morning news on channel 11 sometime. They have a pretty good morning crew. Julie and Rebecca work well together.
Funny thing too. Remember when Rather tried to pass of his fakes re "W's" TANG service? It was KHOU radio that gave ol' Dan the boot. Two different worlds I guess...
FGS
This is Channel 11 in Houston, I believe. At least that link
goes to http://www.khou.com/, a Houston station, I believe.
That would be the prudent thing to do.
Well, then, I can't do it. Never must I be accused of being a prude . . . oh, wait, you said "prudent." That's okay, then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.