Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AL GONZALES FOR AG?
Michelle Malkin's Blog ^ | November 10, 2004 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 11/10/2004 5:52:25 PM PST by rmlew

According to this article, White House counsel Alberto Gonzales is the leading candidate to replace John Ashcroft as Attorney General.

This column by Robert Novak, written in January 2003, suggests that Gonzales is no friend of conservatives. An excerpt:

Gonzales's views on affirmative action became widely known in Washington last year when, at a meeting of the conservative Federalist Society, he announced his support of preferences....
[When he served on the Texas Supreme Court, he] had pulled the Texas court leftward, including decisions favorable to trial lawyers on tort cases. What most disturbed conservatives was his majority opinion invalidating a statute requiring parental notification of abortion by a minor. Democratic senators who last year blocked confirmation of Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen as a federal appellate judge repeatedly cited Gonzales's attack on her minority opinion as an "unconscionable act of judicial activism."

That alone led prominent Catholic conservatives and other foes of abortion to inform the White House that Gonzales is unacceptable for the high court.


Update: Over at The Corner, Roger Clegg writes:
The problem with Al Gonzales as AG is his failure to oppose racial preferences. He played a critical role in watering down the administration’s briefs in the University of Michigan cases, and generally has the reputation for being a squish on this issue. The Dems will try to extract promises during the hearings that he will continue this lackluster record; Republicans should push him to mend his ways. Specter will join the Dems.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: albertogonzalez; attorneygeneral; shutup; solicitorgeneral
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
The lefties are so angry at Gonzales for argueing the position of the administration, that they fail to look at Gonzales's real record.

Michelle Malkin cites two stories on Gonzales. http://michellemalkin.com/archives/000840.htm

If you support affirmative discrimination, unimpeded trial lawyers, and abortions for minors, you will love Gonzales.

If personel is policy, then the Bush administration is tacking left.

Millions of Americans voted for Bush on social issues and to ensure that the Judiciary is run by people who believe in the Constitution. Between tacit support for Spector and the appointment of Gonzales, Bush has not waited untill all the votes are counted in the election before betraying his socially-conservative and Constitutionalist base.

We are stuck depending on Senate Republicans to break with the administration and defend the Constitution. We will soon see if any of the Senators hoping to run in 2008 are worth supporting.

We, the grassroots should give them, a push.

1 posted on 11/10/2004 5:52:26 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rmlew
If personel is policy, then the Bush administration is tacking left.

Attempt to mend the divisions magnified by the election?

2 posted on 11/10/2004 5:57:14 PM PST by sonofagun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

I wonder what Santorum's gonna do. He's about the toughest we've got at this point, isn't he? Who are the front line conservatives? Most of our big names are fairly moderate. Help me out. Gimme 5 good solid conservative senators.


3 posted on 11/10/2004 5:59:22 PM PST by Huck (Any man, gay or straight, can marry a woman. That's equal treatment under the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

what an idiotic post. judge gonzales has been by the president's side for the last four years. he developed the legal strategy for the war on terror. he advised the president to seek a constitutional amendment to protect marriage. he has given the president a slew of conservative judicial nominees for the appellate courts. and he advised the president to sign the ban on partial birth abortion. what's not to like about that? he's clearly in the conservative mainstream, even if we don't like his position on one case about racial preferences. when are we going to learn -- you can't build a majority by imposing a 100 percent purity test on all appointees.


4 posted on 11/10/2004 6:00:09 PM PST by florida one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun
Attempt to mend the divisions magnified by the election?
IE sell out his base for a few parapgraphs of positive media, which will be ignored the next day?
5 posted on 11/10/2004 6:01:19 PM PST by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Oh how nice, yet another thread for all the whiners....
6 posted on 11/10/2004 6:01:21 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (The price of freedom is eternal vigilance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: florida one

I agree....and as an employee of the Dept of Justice, let me tell you, we were happy has hell thast this is our new boss and there were alot of tears flowing today listening to his statement at the announcement of his nomination. in addition, i saw him speak at an event in houston 8 years ago and he was wonderful....he truly is the american dream come true! Go Alberto!


8 posted on 11/10/2004 6:02:38 PM PST by BamaDi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Is Gonzalez going to the Judiciary? Then what does all this fluff about 'invalidating' Texas law have to do with it? And he never invalidated a Texas law....... pure horse manure


9 posted on 11/10/2004 6:03:09 PM PST by deport (I've done a lot things.... seen a lot of things..... Most of which I don't remember.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

I think the dems should (they won't) try to heal divisions because if they continue tacking left, they will have another 2002 in 2006 and another 2004 in 2008. Even James Carville and Clinton said that. Of course, they both want Hillary in 2008, so she will be moving right for the next four.

I think Bush is rewarding a friend. He has always been known to be loyal to a fault and he probably thinks this is a temporary position (4 years) not lifetime, to use to pay Gonazalez back for his loyalty to Bush. After all, Gonazalez could have gone into private practice and made a whole lot more $$$$$$$$$$.


10 posted on 11/10/2004 6:03:59 PM PST by Txsleuth (Proud to be a Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: florida one
1. Supporting affirmative discrimination crosses a line in the sand for conservatives. It is bad politics and worse policy. It is a racial spoils system and an attack on the nation.
2. Gonzales screws conservatives whenever he has leeway. He torpedoed a Surpeme Court case. What will he do as AG?
3. Gonzales is bad on abortion, the death penalty, and affirmative action.
11 posted on 11/10/2004 6:05:35 PM PST by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

"Attempt to mend the divisions magnified by the election?"

Mending does not include placing in leadership persons disposed to take the Party more to the left.

We'll have to wait and see, but if Bush keeps this up, he will substantially lose the support of conservatives (who gave him the victory).

He's going to need that support a lot throughout the next four years, so he better tread carefully with these appointments.

People are just out and out tired of these political games.
They're not going to support it anymore.


12 posted on 11/10/2004 6:06:18 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Gonzales?

Immigration laws???

We don't NEED NO STEENKIN' IMMIGRATION LAWS!!!


13 posted on 11/10/2004 6:10:57 PM PST by sarah_f (Know Islam, Know Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145; rmlew

conservatives = whiners eh?

Thanks for pointing out the difference between conservatives and republicans again.


14 posted on 11/10/2004 6:14:23 PM PST by sarah_f (Know Islam, Know Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sarah_f

Don't try to put words into my statement.


15 posted on 11/10/2004 6:15:30 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (The price of freedom is eternal vigilance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father; Luke21; churchillbuff; Happy2BMe; xm177e2; AmericaUnited; St. Johann Tetzel; ...

Conservatives must oppose Gonzales.


16 posted on 11/10/2004 6:16:42 PM PST by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

If standing up for the Constitution makes my a whiner, then I'll be a Weiner before standing aside as Bush and Schumer agree on a liberal AG.


17 posted on 11/10/2004 6:18:20 PM PST by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I don't know anything about Gonzales.

What is his biggest drawback as an AG?

18 posted on 11/10/2004 6:27:39 PM PST by Happy2BMe (It's not quite time to rest - John Kerry is still out there (and so is Hillary))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Please read the article.
19 posted on 11/10/2004 6:31:00 PM PST by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Are you nuts? Gonzales bad on the death penalty? Check out the Atlantic Monthly article criticizing Gonzales for backing so many executions in Texas. On abortion, what do you know about the guy -- he's backing the partial birth abortion ban and used to head catholic charities in Texas. Get some facts. And if he's untouchable for his role in the affirmative action case, then so is the President who took exactly the same position. Gonzales is a hard-ass, who'll take the fight to the terrorists and who will fill DOJ slots with solid conservatives. Stop your whining.


20 posted on 11/10/2004 6:34:09 PM PST by florida one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson