Skip to comments.
List Of People BY SAT SCORE. (W, Kerry, Clinton LOL)
Free Dictionary.Com ^
| 10/17/04
| jwalsh07
Posted on 10/17/2004 10:18:18 AM PDT by jwalsh07
List of people by SAT score. Check out Jhengis Johnny and the Slickster. Al Gore evidently had somebody take the SAT's for him because nobody acquires that much stupid.
(Excerpt) Read more at encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: dem; pubbie; smart; stupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: KwasiOwusu
The most stupid ones make the most noise, starting with the vicious, nasty Janeane Garofalo, closely followed by the rabid Al Franken and John Kerry. Oh Lordy, have you got that right.
I have no idea what my SAT score is; in any case it was a very long time ago. But I still get a lot of mileage out of this game:
Whenever a legend-in-his-own-mind starts in on me I do two things: announce that my SAT score was only 378. And challenge him to go on line and pick a random IQ test that we can both take and compare results.
It's a lose-lose proposition for the dweeb.
21
posted on
10/17/2004 10:53:56 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
To: jwalsh07; Dont Mention the War
I think when I took the ACT in 74 that the max score was 34 or 35.
I know the LSAT has changed their scoring ...when I took it in 80, anything north of 700 was great.
22
posted on
10/17/2004 10:55:15 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
To: jwalsh07
By asking the people involved. The website makes clear that the scores are "unverified" but most of them are from the mouths of the people listed. A plausible enough explanation, except for one thing:
Why would anyone admit to an SAT score under 900?
23
posted on
10/17/2004 10:56:56 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
To: Publius6961
I think the answer to your question is obvious. Think about it. LOL
24
posted on
10/17/2004 11:02:38 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
To: jwalsh07
25
posted on
10/17/2004 11:09:19 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
To: wardaddy
I went to HS with a guy who scored 1600, TIWCE He took the test two years in a row and scored 1600 on both.
26
posted on
10/17/2004 11:18:15 AM PDT
by
Trepz
To: deadhead
I don't see my name....They took off the top names because they were all FReepers.
27
posted on
10/17/2004 11:20:26 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(Used to be sciencediet but found the solution)
To: jwalsh07
I knew Howard would take up the stern!
28
posted on
10/17/2004 11:21:35 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(Used to be sciencediet but found the solution)
To: Dont Mention the War
In our local HS we had a gal score 1600 two years ago and her brother score at 1600 last year.
29
posted on
10/17/2004 11:24:02 AM PDT
by
zeaal
(SPREAD TRUTH!)
To: jwalsh07
LOL, but how do we explain Gore? All that weed in Divinity School took its toll.
30
posted on
10/17/2004 11:41:23 AM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
(I want to have fanatical henchmen when I grow up.)
To: Tijeras_Slim
LOL about Gore and his weed.
I do have one concern about these reported scores- When I took the SAT in 88, scores were reported in increments of 10 points. That means that some of the scores on the list can't be right. Does anyone here know if they changed the scoring over the years?
To: LiberalsScareMe
I guess im a Stupe compared to Gore....LOL...My Sat was only 1100.
Poor me, can I ever be President with such a low score compared to Gore?
All kidding aside--who took Gore's test for him? He surely isnt that smart.
32
posted on
10/17/2004 3:44:51 PM PDT
by
joevberry333
(www.TheConservativeRepublican.com)
To: Trepz
How successful has he been in life.
IQ helps but is no guarantee....drive is either innate or not.
33
posted on
10/17/2004 5:38:13 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
To: jwalsh07
Not a chance this is right. Garafalo and Franken's scores appear vastly inflated.
To: NittanyLion
35
posted on
10/17/2004 5:48:55 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
To: LiberalsScareMe
I do have one concern about these reported scores- When I took the SAT in 88, scores were reported in increments of 10 points. That means that some of the scores on the list can't be right. Does anyone here know if they changed the scoring over the years?I took them in '68, scores were reported in increments of 1.
36
posted on
10/17/2004 5:51:01 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
To: wardaddy
How successful, I could not say. Have not seen him in 40+ years.
37
posted on
10/17/2004 7:13:58 PM PDT
by
Trepz
To: Trepz
dang...you're older than me...a rarity on this board these days where I feel like the average age is around 25-27.
38
posted on
10/17/2004 7:48:24 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
To: Publius6961
these kind of lists are invariably made up. Good for a laugh though.
39
posted on
10/17/2004 8:24:30 PM PDT
by
Mac017
(NZer)
To: jwalsh07
I wonder if the Doonesbury loser will make a comic strip out of this. /sarcasm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson