[Noumenon]

No problemo. Whatever they start, I'll be more than happy to finish. With extreme prejudice. It's long overdue.

[CzarNicky]

They don't have to worry Bush will bury Kerry. But yes we still have to go out and vote. I know you don't have to say act like we are 10 points behind because if I did that I would be voting for Dole.

[EggsAckley]

I can't help but wonder just WHAT they think they would accomplish by rioting.

[Sam Cree]

That means if the Dems try to steal the election again, but get we won't stand for it again, they'll riot? OK.

[KC_Conspirator]

Too bad it’s 2004 and there’s a whole generation of voters who are worried about islamic fanaticism, not Kissinger and the Phantom Military-Industrial Complex starring Bell Helicopter.

That is too funny. Now its Rumfeld and Halliburton. Som templates never change.

[MadIvan]

If you look on Usenet you'll find a large undercurrent of violence in what the left is saying. They are simply not going to be mature enough to accept a Bush victory, no matter what the margin is.

I would definitely look for at least a year of sporadic demonstrations by the "kookified left", many of them resulting in violence. Of course, this will totally bury the left in the eyes of the majority.

Regards, Ivan

[mhking]

I had this very conversation with my 'on the fence' brother in Chicago more than a month ago.

He's heard from more than one person that if there is a close election (not unlike four years ago) and if we win, that there will be riots in the streets.

We're both hopeful that this won't be the case, but I had to conceed that many of the KoolAid drinkers are unbalanced enough to take to the streets.

Forewarned is forearmed, though.

 

Double-barrelled Mega-PING! to both lists! If you want on, FReepmail me!

[CSM]

More politics of fear, doom and gloom! The party of tolerence has no respect for the opinions of others.

[Grampa Dave]

Is there any reason why that entire article can't be posted. It is great!

[Mr. Thorne]

Cool. Can we shoot 'em?

[Grampa Dave]

The left wing lunatics appear determined to make the Cold Civil War II into hot Civil War II.

I guess that I need to buy some new ammo and use the old ammo practicing and sighting in the upcoming weeks.

[subterfuge]

IMO, this is really what the left wants. It has become clear to me that the socialists/clintons et.al, really have torpedoed the Kerry campaign and are doing it in a way that is MEANT TO STIR UP THE MASSES on the left so they are fuming for the 2008 election. Then they will all be begging hIlLaRy! to be their queen.

Diane Sawyer, grilling Kerry!? Its become so obvious, the plan is to make as much political hay for the next go-round as possible.

[wjcsux]

I am ready for them! Bring em on!

[bad company]

Isn't this how the media started the Rodney King riots, by talking it up for weeks ahead of time?

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

They riot and some of them are going to get killed.

The rest will be serving long prison terms.

Which they should enjoy. After all they would be totally provided for by the state and they have no freedom. Pretty close to Nirvana for that bunch.

[WilliamWallace1999]

If they start it, we finish it.

[SavageRepublican]

Bring it on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(Have baseball bat, will travel).

[desherwood7]

So let me get this straight. The liberals want to riot if President Bush gets re-elected. Isn't that what Leon Trotsky preached, Perpetual Revolution?

[bmwcyle]

OK, please do it on my street. I need the target practice.

[DaveMSmith]

The key to the article is the democrat primaries: they had a choice to select a serious candidate. Instead, they allowed their party to be hijacked resulting in an unelectable nominee who lied to win.

The democrat party needs a housecleaning. The democrat party needs leadership. If they don't step up, I don't see any other result than the disintegration of the DNC.