Posted on 09/15/2004 11:30:46 AM PDT by rocklobster11
Addition:
Here is what she said:
"He did have complaints about Bush. Bush missed his physical and went off to Alabama with none of the paperwork, I remember Killian talking about that," Knox said. "But it wasn't in memo file."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1216254/posts
Wow. I mean, wow. I thought we had some tinfoilers on this site, but just damn.
More:
"Newly released computerized payroll records show no indication Mr. Bush drilled with the Alabama unit during July, August and September of 1972, The Associated Press has reported."
I am going to take over the News Department at CBS; even I know that those were the months that Bush worked on Blount's campaign and went to the GOP convention.
And there ARE pay stubs for October and November.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1215022/posts
Since we know that this documentation is forged, I wonder if the 1973 date is itself a typo.
Proof that stupid people can be diabolical.
Or that someone smart came up with the concept, and someone stupid was responsible for the implementation
Yes, and someone at the DNC has their reply to Roger Stones infamous swinger ad.
The request was made by 1st Lt Bush on September 5th 1972 as can be seen here
http://www.usatoday.com/news/bushdocs/6-Reassignments_Spilt_Training.pdf page 8
So, what if you knew that this was being planned by the DNC as far back as August 11 (prior to the SwiftVets getting much press). See:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1216791/posts for confirmation that Bob Tuke, a Kerry supported from Tennessee, knew about the planned National Guard-missed physical-cocain story that was coming.
"And I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for you damned kids in pajamas!"
DU - "Did Rove plant the CBS TANG documents? Did he do the same to Hatfield author of Fortunate Son, the book which broke the story of Bush's cocaine conviction back in 2000? "
That's another piece of the puzzle solved. I was wondering why this was called "Operation Fortunate Son". I thought it was just about the privilege angle that Hatfield talked about in his discredited book. But if Hatfield talked about Bush's alleged cocaine addiction in 2000, that's why COCAINE is the common denominator in the whole campaign named after his book.
The reason? Very, very simple explannation.
Kerry is drowning...the polls are destroying him, the RNC convention pummeled him, The Swift Vets presence, as well as the book Unfit For Command is depleting him, and he is like a fish out of water so to speak. What do his scheming planners decide to do? Bring Bush down to the same level as he is, and make the whole "past military record" which kerry has totally lacked any credibility on, to Bush's doorstep to negate any validity to Bush having served honorably, in hopes as a last minute attempt to boost kerry's chances in the presidency again. But kerry is finished, especially now once the FACT that these doc's were forged, and especially if they can trace them back to him or his campaign. Kerry will be another Mondale on November 2nd.
Absolute Hypocrites these liberal media types....and Dem voters for that matter.
Geeeze....looking at the types Kerry was hanging with.....it must have been pot smoker..drug mainline city[Haight Ashbury goes to Washington].
Bong Kerry
Hotknive hashish Kerry
Honey oil Kerry
Tai stick Kerry
Cambodian Kerry
White powder Mah......Kerry : )
Democrats.....the party of manipulating Hypocrites
Maybe this fiasco was set up for two reasons:
1. To get the media coverage off of the Swiftees because they will be coming forward to the Kerry-Viet Cong conferences while Kerry was still in the reserve and the country was in a war. Consorting with the enemy during a war and being a member of the American armed forces at the time seems to be grounds for court martial.
2. To lay the ground work for the rumored "take Bush down if he does slip through and wins the election" plot. Maybe the groundwork for some obscene claim (what I have no idea).
Good catch on the Fortunate Son thing. This whole thing might have succeeded if the forgeries hadn't been uncovered. But I think there is no doubt the DNC is behind it and is going to get nailed.
....Danny boy thought this was going to sink the President?
...
That is my question - who cares if someone took drugs 30 years ago. Yet, if laying a false report they hoped to sell that they "sold" drugs - that might have legs.
Yep, the memos, Kitty's book, the DNC ads, they were all timed to splatter mud all over the POTUS. Instead, they are all standing around with egg all over their faces.
Very good points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.