Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rocklobster11
Well, I guess I don't believe this theory. The pargraph below is from this site. It's pretty technical, but it is clear that the development of drug tests was in the early stages in 1972. Of course, they could be just as stupid about drug tests as they are about word processing.

______________

In 1972, Rubenstein and his co-workers published the first details of a "homogenous enzyme immunoassay." Others labeled it an enzyme multiplied immunological technique, hence the acronym EMIT®, which is a trademark of the Syva Corporation.
55 posted on 09/15/2004 12:21:15 PM PDT by self_evident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: self_evident
Well, I guess I don't believe this theory

You don't believe it because you are a Republican (ie, intellectually honest, logical, fact based). The cocaine story is not meant to sway reasoned voters. It is meant to depress the base and the uninformed. Based on what I've read on other threads, I think it is absolutely provable that Bush wouldn't have been subject to a drug test during his physical in 1973, but I doubt that CBS was planning on analyzing the story from that angle.

62 posted on 09/15/2004 12:26:55 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: self_evident

But were they done routinely (with the physicals) in the military? My retired USCG hubby says no, not until the 80's.


93 posted on 09/15/2004 1:53:32 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson