Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Urge people to vote for Bush, win $100,000.
VOTEorNOT.org ^

Posted on 09/13/2004 1:11:22 PM PDT by tigerteam_ab

Hi,

I just signed up for the VOTE or NOT Challenge. The challenge is to raise awareness and get as many of our friends and family to participate in the Election. The 2000 Election was decided by about 500 votes, so all our votes matter!! This year's election may be just as close.

If you sign up for the challenge, you also get entered into a sweepstakes to win $100,000, and if you refer the winner to the challenge (like I'm doing right now), you get $100,000 too. In other words, if you join and win, we BOTH get $100,000. They're doing this to encourage us to spread the word fast, because the voter registration deadline is coming up soon.

Please sign up, when you join they will let me know so I'll know I don't have to email you about this anymore. It takes less than a minute to do, so sign up now for the challenge through my referral link:

http://dm312z2.VOTEorNOT.org

If you still need to register to vote, you can do it online at http://VOTEorNOT.org/register.php

Thanks!


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: christianvote; evangelicalvote; gotv; militaryvote; voting
This looks legit. It was reported on Wired news (http://wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,64869,00.html), and these are the guys who run the (admittedly very cheesy) hotornot.com and the much more interesting yafro.com (allows you to post pictures and comments, used by some soldiers in Iraq to post pictures, http://www.yafro.com/frontline.php, and others to rally for Bush's reelection, http://www.yafro.com/clubs/wesupportgeorgebushgop).

Don't let this prize money fall into the hands of some Emily's List donating liberals, tell your conservative friends now! ;)

1 posted on 09/13/2004 1:11:23 PM PDT by tigerteam_ab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tigerteam_ab

I always thought that voter turnout would be huge if you combined voting with the lottery. One vote, one chance to win!


2 posted on 09/13/2004 1:13:16 PM PDT by Pest (I will choose Free Will!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tigerteam_ab

Folks, Republicans are out-registered by about 2 to 1 in some areas. The only thing that saves the day on 'election day', is that democrat voters don't show up to vote. Think about it! Which side does a large turn-out help?

I'm not urging anyone to vote. Conservatives vote their concience. Liberals are the only ones that need to be paid to get out the vote.

Don't urge others to vote unless you damned well which way they are voting.


3 posted on 09/13/2004 1:18:23 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tigerteam_ab
Part of the "Rock the Vote" effort. If you don't think enough of your country to vote without being compensated (even if through a lottery) you probably shouldn't be voting.
4 posted on 09/13/2004 1:18:32 PM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tigerteam_ab
Dear sir,

We want to transfer to overseas ($ 152,000.000.00 USD) One hundred and Fifty two million United States Dollars) from a Prime Bank in Africa, I want to ask you to quietly look for a reliable and honest person who will be capable and fit to provide either an existing bank account or to set up a new Bank a/c immediately to receive this money, even an empty a/c can serve to receive this money, as long as you will remain honest to me till the end for this important business trusting in you and believing in God that you will never let me down either now or in future.

Sincerely


Vote or Not


Sorry, I couldn't resist. :)

5 posted on 09/13/2004 1:19:44 PM PDT by TonyInOhio ("When it comes to diplomacy, it looks like John Kerry should stick to windsurfing. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tigerteam_ab

Conservatives don't need money. We are all rich and always vote.


6 posted on 09/13/2004 1:20:57 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Dan Rather don't need no stinkin facts, he is a journalist and therefore above reproach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pest

I would be very afraid of an electorate equal to the union of "the set of all people who wish to vote" and "the set of all people who play the lottery".


7 posted on 09/13/2004 1:23:25 PM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"Folks, Republicans are out-registered by about 2 to 1 in some areas. The only thing that saves the day on 'election day', is that democrat voters don't show up to vote. Think about it! Which side does a large turn-out help?"

Four MILLION evangelical Christians didn't vote in 2000 (http://www.townhall.com/columnists/douggiles/dg20040911.shtml). I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that if they had, they would have overwhelmingly voted for Bush, for conservative congressman, for ballot measures that support conservative values, and against measures that don't.

"Don't urge others to vote unless you damned well which way they are voting."

Agreed.

8 posted on 09/13/2004 1:28:01 PM PDT by tigerteam_ab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tigerteam_ab

From their "privacy rules"

"In most cases, we do not intentionally transfer this information to unaffiliated third parties without your consent."

Now just who are the "affiliated" parties that they will intentionally transfer your info to ?

How much ( well, can't call it spam anymore since you signed up for it ) will you get ?

These guys are making money somehow....


9 posted on 09/13/2004 1:28:34 PM PDT by RS (The Truth may be slimy, but it is never slime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
I would be very afraid of an electorate equal to the union of "the set of all people who wish to vote" and "the set of all people who play the lottery".

Hmm, I have heard the lottery called the "idiot tax" (though I will admit to having bought a handful of tickets myself over the years ;).

10 posted on 09/13/2004 1:30:17 PM PDT by tigerteam_ab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pest; tigerteam_ab; DoughtyOne; The_Victor; TonyInOhio; Conspiracy Guy; avg_freeper
I always thought that voter turnout would be huge if you combined voting with the lottery. One vote, one chance to win!

Yeah, that's all we need. The majority of lottery players are low-income & low-IQ (that's why they call state lotteries "a tax on the poor & the stupid"). So we'd get millions of people from society's bottom-end packing the voter's booths (probably multiple times), not because they understand the issues and want to make positive changes in how we are governed, but for a shot at getting rich quick.

Increasing voter turnout is unimportant. What's important is getting people well-informed and sufficiently involved in our government. Voting should be somewhat difficult, not made less difficult (e.g., Clinton's "Motor Voter" law); it certainly should never be financially rewarded. If people are too complacent to register or make it to the polls once or twice a year (for the right reasons), then they are surely too complacent to spend the time and mental energy understanding the issues.

Or is all that too un-Politically Correct for you?

11 posted on 09/13/2004 1:31:25 PM PDT by SpyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SpyGuy; avg_freeper

Obviously, you guys are correct. My only observation is that voter turnout would be huge, not that it would be desireable.


12 posted on 09/13/2004 1:34:14 PM PDT by Pest (I will choose Free Will!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tigerteam_ab

"Hmm, I have heard the lottery called the "idiot tax"

I'ts really just a tax on the poor - give them hope to buy a ticket and 50% of it goes to the State...


13 posted on 09/13/2004 1:34:44 PM PDT by RS (The Truth may be slimy, but it is never slime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SpyGuy

A Big Dang DITTO to that!


14 posted on 09/13/2004 1:41:06 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Dan Rather don't need no stinkin facts, he is a journalist and therefore above reproach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson