Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peroutka 2004: Homeland Security Means Securing our Borders
Yahoo/PRNewswire ^ | Aug. 4, 04 | Peroutka

Posted on 08/04/2004 8:16:22 PM PDT by churchillbuff

PASADENA, Md., Aug. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- "All the recent talk about the need for a so-called National Intelligence Director and other additions to the already bloated federal bureaucracy amounts to nothing more than just another reorganization of the government's organizational chart without the benefit of real change," said Michael A. Peroutka, Constitution Party presidential nominee. "One of the most important things the United States can do to prevent future terrorist attacks on our soil is to secure our borders. ADVERTISEMENT

"Sadly, not only has the Bush administration failed to do this, it has actually made the problem worse by floating a so-called amnesty program that would legalize 8 to 10 million illegal aliens," observed Peroutka. According to a recent article from The Washington Times ("Aliens program costs Bush," 8/3/04), the Border Patrol has recently said that Bush's proposal caused a surge in illegal border crossings from Mexico.

The article also points out that Bush's permissive attitude towards illegal immigrants has angered his party's conservative base. It also states that many disenfranchised conservatives fully support Rep. Tom Tancredo (R- Colo.), chairman of the House Immigration Caucus, an outspoken opponent to President Bush's proposal who has pointed out that thousands of these illegals come from countries known to harbor terrorists. "I applaud the strong, principled and constitutional stance that Congressman Tancredo has taken in this matter. He has repeatedly warned the administration of the need to secure our borders and to deport the millions of illegal immigrants currently in our country and he is absolutely right."

Peroutka concluded by offering the following thoughts on the topic, "Bush's plan rewards those who have broken the law. It does not make our homeland safer; it makes it easier for potential terrorists to sneak in. And despite claims to the contrary, this will not help our country's economy, but instead will increase unemployment and adversely effect the median pay scale.

"As president, truly securing our borders and deporting illegal aliens will be one of my top priorities."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: agitprop; aliens; chuckbaldwin; dictatorship; immigration; peroutka; theocracy; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Not to endorse this guy, but the pot does needs stirring. Admit it: Don't you with Bush was saying this stuff?
1 posted on 08/04/2004 8:16:23 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Peroutka discusses the borders: Proving that even a broken clock is right twice a day.


2 posted on 08/04/2004 8:18:45 PM PDT by NCPAC ((Live without Fear: Don't worry about what may happen. Concentrate on what must be done.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

You can't have "home security" if you leave the doors unlocked. Same goes for homeLAND security.


3 posted on 08/04/2004 8:19:12 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCPAC
a broken clock .."

I don't know anything about this guy - except he's saying what Bush should be saying about immigration.

4 posted on 08/04/2004 8:20:23 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

shhhhh.....if it doesn't come from the Republican Party it doesn't need to be said.


5 posted on 08/04/2004 8:25:51 PM PDT by politicalwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NCPAC

Glad he's saying it.


6 posted on 08/04/2004 8:27:45 PM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

A vote for the Constitution Party is a vote for Kerry.


7 posted on 08/04/2004 8:32:34 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
If a group of terrorists pull off another major terror act and are found to have come across our southern border, you can bet we'll find a way to secure our borders. I don't believe it is easy, but I also don't think we're doing anywhere near what we could and if we're struck in this fashion, most of America will agree with me.

And if we're struck by border crossers prior to November, GWB can kiss reelection goodbye. I support him in almost everything else, but he's let us down in this regard.

8 posted on 08/04/2004 8:33:13 PM PDT by umgud (speaking strictly as an infidel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Don't you wish Bush was saying this stuff?

I would prefer that Bush was up 20 points in the polls so that he could afford to say this stuff.

9 posted on 08/04/2004 8:34:22 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: churchillbuff

Admit it: Don't you with Bush was saying this stuff?----

Yes.


11 posted on 08/04/2004 8:36:59 PM PDT by citizen (Write-in Tom Tancredo Pres./Jeff Flake V.P. 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

---A vote for the Constitution Party is a vote for Kerry.---

That statement only applies in states where the race will be close -- in my state of GA Bush will win handily.

My protest vote will go as my tagline sez.


12 posted on 08/04/2004 8:40:30 PM PDT by citizen (Write-in Tom Tancredo Pres./Jeff Flake V.P. 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment

---I would prefer that Bush was up 20 points in the polls so that he could afford to say this stuff.---

If Bush was saying 'this stuff', he'd be stronger in he polls, IMHO.


13 posted on 08/04/2004 8:42:48 PM PDT by citizen (Write-in Tom Tancredo Pres./Jeff Flake V.P. 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Exactly.

Another discussion here regarding the Peroutka/Chuck Baldwin campaign.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1183443/posts?page=23#10


14 posted on 08/04/2004 8:45:40 PM PDT by CajunConservative (Flush the Johns in November !!! We don't need those girlie men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: citizen
If Bush was saying 'this stuff', he'd be stronger in he polls

Yeah. He'd be an unstoppable juggernaut like Peroutka. Just remember - you can't spell "Peroutka" without P,E,R,O,and T.

15 posted on 08/04/2004 8:48:26 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
"All the recent talk about the need for a so-called National Intelligence Director and other additions to the already bloated federal bureaucracy amounts to nothing more than just another reorganization of the government's organizational chart without the benefit of real change."

Short version: "Same monkeys; different tree."

16 posted on 08/04/2004 8:49:26 PM PDT by JackelopeBreeder (Proud to be a mean-spirited and divisive loco gringo armed vigilante terrorist cucaracha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
the pot does needs stirring

In the middle of a critical presidential election with a radical leftist inches away from the White House? No.

And this article is just another case of the liberal press pushing on a wedge issue and telling conservatives to jump... only the gullible on the right eagerly ask how high.

17 posted on 08/04/2004 8:51:27 PM PDT by Tamzee (Tell me honestly, Honey... do these classified documents make me look fat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey

I believe that they have a concerted campaign going on too because they are hitting the christian forums hard and heavy with their rhetoric. They are persistent too. We need to stay on top of this because if we are not careful they will manage to pull off enough critical votes and we are looking at President Kerry.


18 posted on 08/04/2004 8:54:30 PM PDT by CajunConservative (Flush the Johns in November !!! We don't need those girlie men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Bush hasn't done squat to secure the borders, but Kerry would be worse. He'd serve the "immigrants" kool-aid at the border while Terrazzo welcomed them in five languages.
19 posted on 08/04/2004 9:02:16 PM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

If (hoppefully when) Bush is re-elected, but then doesn't secure the borders on his own initiative, he's going to be hearing about on a regular basis.


20 posted on 08/04/2004 9:06:26 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Don't confuse disagreement with argumentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson