Skip to comments.
Peroutka 2004: Homeland Security Means Securing our Borders
Yahoo/PRNewswire ^
| Aug. 4, 04
| Peroutka
Posted on 08/04/2004 8:16:22 PM PDT by churchillbuff
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Not to endorse this guy, but the pot does needs stirring. Admit it: Don't you with Bush was saying this stuff?
To: churchillbuff
Peroutka discusses the borders: Proving that even a broken clock is right twice a day.
2
posted on
08/04/2004 8:18:45 PM PDT
by
NCPAC
((Live without Fear: Don't worry about what may happen. Concentrate on what must be done.))
To: churchillbuff
You can't have "home security" if you leave the doors unlocked. Same goes for homeLAND security.
To: NCPAC
a broken clock .."
I don't know anything about this guy - except he's saying what Bush should be saying about immigration.
To: churchillbuff
shhhhh.....if it doesn't come from the Republican Party it doesn't need to be said.
To: NCPAC
6
posted on
08/04/2004 8:27:45 PM PDT
by
mhx
To: All
A vote for the Constitution Party is a vote for Kerry.
To: churchillbuff
If a group of terrorists pull off another major terror act and are found to have come across our southern border, you can bet we'll find a way to secure our borders. I don't believe it is easy, but I also don't think we're doing anywhere near what we could and if we're struck in this fashion, most of America will agree with me.
And if we're struck by border crossers prior to November, GWB can kiss reelection goodbye. I support him in almost everything else, but he's let us down in this regard.
8
posted on
08/04/2004 8:33:13 PM PDT
by
umgud
(speaking strictly as an infidel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
To: churchillbuff
Don't you wish Bush was saying this stuff? I would prefer that Bush was up 20 points in the polls so that he could afford to say this stuff.
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: churchillbuff
Admit it: Don't you with Bush was saying this stuff?----
Yes.
11
posted on
08/04/2004 8:36:59 PM PDT
by
citizen
(Write-in Tom Tancredo Pres./Jeff Flake V.P. 2004!)
To: COEXERJ145
---A vote for the Constitution Party is a vote for Kerry.---
That statement only applies in states where the race will be close -- in my state of GA Bush will win handily.
My protest vote will go as my tagline sez.
12
posted on
08/04/2004 8:40:30 PM PDT
by
citizen
(Write-in Tom Tancredo Pres./Jeff Flake V.P. 2004!)
To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
---I would prefer that Bush was up 20 points in the polls so that he could afford to say this stuff.---
If Bush was saying 'this stuff', he'd be stronger in he polls, IMHO.
13
posted on
08/04/2004 8:42:48 PM PDT
by
citizen
(Write-in Tom Tancredo Pres./Jeff Flake V.P. 2004!)
To: COEXERJ145
14
posted on
08/04/2004 8:45:40 PM PDT
by
CajunConservative
(Flush the Johns in November !!! We don't need those girlie men.)
To: citizen
If Bush was saying 'this stuff', he'd be stronger in he polls Yeah. He'd be an unstoppable juggernaut like Peroutka. Just remember - you can't spell "Peroutka" without P,E,R,O,and T.
To: churchillbuff
"All the recent talk about the need for a so-called National Intelligence Director and other additions to the already bloated federal bureaucracy amounts to nothing more than just another reorganization of the government's organizational chart without the benefit of real change." Short version: "Same monkeys; different tree."
16
posted on
08/04/2004 8:49:26 PM PDT
by
JackelopeBreeder
(Proud to be a mean-spirited and divisive loco gringo armed vigilante terrorist cucaracha!)
To: churchillbuff
the pot does needs stirring
In the middle of a critical presidential election with a radical leftist inches away from the White House? No.
And this article is just another case of the liberal press pushing on a wedge issue and telling conservatives to jump... only the gullible on the right eagerly ask how high.
17
posted on
08/04/2004 8:51:27 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
(Tell me honestly, Honey... do these classified documents make me look fat?)
To: Tamsey
I believe that they have a concerted campaign going on too because they are hitting the christian forums hard and heavy with their rhetoric. They are persistent too. We need to stay on top of this because if we are not careful they will manage to pull off enough critical votes and we are looking at President Kerry.
18
posted on
08/04/2004 8:54:30 PM PDT
by
CajunConservative
(Flush the Johns in November !!! We don't need those girlie men.)
To: churchillbuff
Bush hasn't done squat to secure the borders, but Kerry would be worse. He'd serve the "immigrants" kool-aid at the border while Terrazzo welcomed them in five languages.
To: churchillbuff
If (hoppefully when) Bush is re-elected, but then doesn't secure the borders on his own initiative, he's going to be hearing about on a regular basis.
20
posted on
08/04/2004 9:06:26 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Don't confuse disagreement with argumentation.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson