Replies

I can't tell you how disappointed I am that you appear to believe it's "God's will" that the sterile and the homosexual should reproduce at the cost of dozens of human lives for the one selected for implantation.

God's original plan was corrupted by Man's succumbing to exactly the temptation you have succumbed to here: the usurping of God's place in determining what is Good and what is Evil.

Human life is good. It begins at the moment of conception. You cannot pretend that -- simply because it comforts you personally that you can't fathom Death's causing pain to an embryo -- it's okay to kill some human lives so that the more Desirable of their kin end up fully human in your estimation.

You're a good man, Ron. I beg you to rethink the path you are taking here.

Askel, my aunt had between three and five miscarriages before she delivered her first child. Does she suffer the same damnation from you folks that Brook Shild's does? If not who does, God? I don't ask this to be blasphemous, but the truth is, even under the best of intentions, fertilized eggs even further along than the fertilized eggs of Brooks Shield's are destroyed by natural causes. Why is it worse when humans do their best to allow a woman to become pregnant and deliver a healthy child? If the destroyed fertilized egg is a sin, then someone must be responsible in all instances, whether natural or not. Who is the guilty party when a woman miscarries?