Perhaps I should have started it up with this:
"Reading something takes reading it. Assuming from opening remarks to have garnered the point is simply not all that worth starting to read in the first place. Reading something also requires acquiring the point of the words as a whole. If one is going to read simply those words that push the personal trigger then waiting for the Cliff's Notes version or video tape it worth putting the piece down."
Oh I read it, just wasn't all that impressed with the premise. There is no foundation layed for the argument is set.
To begin with, I would not call the difference emotion.
The reason you see liberals marching and not conservatives as often is that conservatives have far less time since they work.
Liberals have no rational argument for anything, so they yell at everything. They are loud and rude in attempts to both get attention and to hide the lack of gray matter behind their arguments.
I think conservatives in general argue more out of common sense and the facts, meanwhile if liberals have emotion, it is because they are simple like children that are behaving badly.