Yes, it was cryptic. Nevertheless I said about as much as I could, and maybe more than I should.
But if I'm wrong for making "cryptic" charges when I, admittedly, have only incomplete information myself, maybe those of you (still) obsessively defending certain banned posters, not to mention revisiting sore subjects, should consider the incompleteness of your own information.
At least some or your fellow freepers (by which I mean more than one) appear to sincerely believe... Well, scratch that. I don't want to prolong this unhelpfull discussion about "stalking". Let me put it this way. The moderators made a decision (after warnings and temporary suspensions, btw) to ban a certain freeper. Maybe there was more to that than meets the eye, and maybe there wasn't. I don't know for sure myself, and neither do you. (And, again, if you do know your continuining to bring up this subject is, potentially, invidious as well as irritating.)
Either way a decision was made, by the moderators, uncompensated people working hard every day, and doing the very best they can, to maintain a civil and stimulating forum for our mutual benefit. Why don't you try accepting it. It's been nearly two months, after all, which seems plenty long enough for mourning (and pissing and moaning).