[Scutter]

From what I remember about BADJOE, he seemed like a good egg. There's something disturbing about a thread like this attracting so many negative posts about a good person.

I wonder if all the folks posting negative things about BADJOE here even know who he is.

[CyberCowboy777]

I personally don't care - BadJoe was a nice guy - but he is being stupid - which he is free to do - but we don't have to like it.

[strela]

I wonder if all the folks posting negative things about BADJOE here even know who he is.

I DO know who he is. He is an individual who I have met and once called 'friend', and who is now threatening to disclose Jim's trade secrets in what is essentially a temper tantrum over being being required to follow the same rules on FreeRepublic that the rest of us do. That's who Badjoe is.

[Mr. Mojo]

There's something disturbing about a thread like this attracting so many negative posts about a good person.

There's something disturbing about defending a nutcase who's so bitter about being banned from FR that's he's been stewing about it every day for over a year, meticulously planning his "revenge." Man, talk about having no life. As I mentioned, rubber-room material.

[Sabertooth]

From what I remember about BADJOE, he seemed like a good egg. There's something disturbing about a thread like this attracting so many negative posts about a good person.

I wonder if all the folks posting negative things about BADJOE here even know who he is.

Excellent question.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Maybe you missed the part in the original post; the word "betrayal". A good egg? Yea, right. The only good to come from it IMO was to bring to the surface the scum so it could be wiped away. Jim doesn't need "good eggs" like that, I think.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

From what I remember about BADJOE, he seemed like a good egg. There's something disturbing about a thread like this attracting so many negative posts about a good person.

You really do need to catch up.